The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of data partitioning and sampling methods to support big data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Computer clusters with the shared-nothing architecture are the major computing platforms for big data processing and analysis. In cluster computing, data partitioning and sampling are two fundamental strategies to speed up the computation of big data and increase scalability. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of the methods and techniques of data partitioning and sampling with respect to big data processing and analysis. We start with an overview of the mainstream big data frameworks on Hadoop clusters. The basic methods of data partitioning are then discussed including three classical horizontal partitioning schemes: range, hash, and random partitioning. Data partitioning on Hadoop clusters is also discussed with a summary of new strategies for big data partitioning, including the new Random Sample Partition (RSP) distributed model. The classical methods of data sampling are then investigated, including simple random sampling, stratified sampling, and reservoir sampling. Two common methods of big data sampling on computing clusters are also discussed: record-level sampling and block-level sampling. Record-level sampling is not as efficient as block-level sampling on big distributed data. On the other hand, block-level sampling on data blocks generated with the classical data partitioning methods does not necessarily produce good representative samples for approximate computing of big data. In this survey, we also summarize the prevailing strategies and related work on sampling-based approximation on Hadoop clusters. We believe that data partitioning and sampling should be considered together to build approximate cluster computing frameworks that are reliable in both the computational and statistical respects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Classification and regression trees
Praagman, J. (1985) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(85)90321-2 · Cited by 10,053
The Hadoop Distributed File System
Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., & Chansler, R. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST) · doi:10.1109/msst.2010.5496972 · Cited by 4,834
Resilient distributed datasets: a fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing
Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Das, T., Dave, A., Ma, J. H., McCauley, M., Franklin, M. J. M., Shenker, S. J., & Stoica, I. G. (2012) · Cited by 3,622
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1249 · Cited by 3,103
Dryad: distributed data-parallel programs from sequential building blocks
Isard, M., Budiu, M., Yu, Y., Birrell, A., & Fetterly, D. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems 2007 · doi:10.1145/1272996.1273005 · Cited by 2,432
Cited by
Yin, X., Zhu, Y., & Hu, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3460427 · Cited by 638
Big data with cloud computing: Discussions and challenges
Sandhu, A. K. (2022) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2021.9020016 · Cited by 280
A systematic review of privacy techniques in recommendation systems
Ogunseyi, T. B., Avoussoukpo, C. B., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00710-1 · Cited by 27
Semantic Image Analysis on Social Networks and Data Processing: Review and Future Directions
Alzboon, M. S., Alqaraleh, M. K., Aljarrah, E. M., & Alomari, S. A. (2022) · Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9016-4.ch009 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahmud, M. S., Huang, J. Z., Salloum, S., Emara, T. Z., & Sadatdiynov, K.
- Venue
- Big Data Mining and Analytics
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-101
- ISSN
- 2096-0654 (ISSN-L)
- 2097-406X
- OpenAlex
- W3018761215
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 42.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of data partitioning and sampling methods to support big data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26599/bdma.2019.9020015
- The paper
- Mahmud, M. S., Huang, J. Z., Salloum, S., Emara, T. Z., & Sadatdiynov, K. (2020). A survey of data partitioning and sampling methods to support big data analysis. Big Data Mining and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.26599/bdma.2019.9020015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.