Semantic Image Analysis on Social Networks and Data Processing: Review and Future Directions
Abstract
In the last decade, a significant number of people have become active social network users. People utilize Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+. Facebook users generate a lot of data. Photos can teach people a lot. Image analysis has traditionally focused on audience emotions. Photographic emotions are essentially subjective and vary among observers. There are numerous uses for its most popular feature. People, on the other hand, use social media and applications. They handle noise, dynamics, and size. Shared text, pictures, and videos were also a focus of network analysis study. Statistic, rules, and trend analysis are all available in massive datasets. You may use them for data manipulation and retrieval, mathematical modeling, and data pre-processing and interpretation. This chapter examines social networks, basic concepts, and social network analysis components. A further study topic is picture usage in social networks. Next, a novel method for analyzing social networks, namely semantic networks, is presented. Finally, themes and routes are defined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Role-play is a communicative technique that encourages students to use and understand English in a situation, something traditional methods and grammar translation cannot achieve.
“It is a communicative technique that encourages students to use and understand English in a situation, something that traditional methods and grammar translation cannot achieve (Alwagfi, Aljawarneh, & Alomari, 2020; Alzboon, Alqaraleh, Aljarrah, & Alomari, 2022; Amaireh & Rababah, 2024).”
From An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Role-play in Improving Fluency in Jordanian EFL Students' Speaking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Alzboon, Alqaraleh, Aljarrah, & Alomari, 2022
Cites
Detecting Clusters of Fake Accounts in Online Social Networks
Xiao, C., Freeman, D. M., & Hwa, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security · doi:10.1145/2808769.2808779 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective
Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & de la Piedad Garcia, X. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.026 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The dynamics of health behavior sentiments on a large online social network
Salathé, M., Vu, D. Q., Khandelwal, S., & Hunter, D. R. (2013) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds16 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rababah, L. M. (2025) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n4p30 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alzboon, M. S., Alqaraleh, M. K., Aljarrah, E. M., & Alomari, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Jadara University (JO)
- Venue
- Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics
- Publisher
- IGI Global
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 189-214
- ISSN
- 2327-3275 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-3283
- OpenAlex
- W4213113193
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in business information systems and analytics book series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- social networks, semantic networks, image analysis, social media, Facebook, Twitter, audience emotional response, photographic analysis, network analysis, data processing, data retrieval, trend analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review