Exploring Pathogenic Mutation in Allosteric Proteins: The Prediction and Beyond
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Allosteric regulation that triggers the functional activity of a protein through conformational changes is an inherent function of the protein in numerous physiological and pathological scenarios. In the post-genomic era, a central challenge for disease genomes is the identification of the biological effects of specific somatic variants on allosteric proteins and the phenotypes they influence during the initiation and progression of diseases. Here, we analyzed more than 38539 mutations observed in 90 human genes with 740 allosteric protein chains. We found that existing allosteric protein mutations are associated with many diseases, but the clinical significance of the majority of mutations in allosteric proteins remains unclear. Next, we developed a machine-learning-based model for pathogenic mutation prediction of allosteric proteins based on the intrinsic characteristics of proteins and the prediction results from existed methods. When tested on the benchmark allosteric protein dataset, the proposed method achieves AUCs of 0.868 and AUPR of 0.894 on allosteric proteins. Furthermore, we explored the performance of existing methods in predicting the pathogenicity of mutations at allosteric sites and identified potential significant pathogenic mutations at allosteric sites using the proposed method. In summary, these findings illuminate the significance of allosteric mutation in disease processes, and contribute a valuable tool for the identification of pathogenic mutations as well as previously unknown disease-causing allosteric-protein-encoded genes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science
Fowler, D. M., & Fields, S. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3027 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Allosteric post-translational modification codes
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.-J., Xin, F., & Radivojac, P. (2012) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2012.07.001 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Predicting functional effect of missense variants using graph attention neural networks
Zhang, H., Xu, M. S., Fan, X., Chung, W. K., & Shen, Y. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00561-w · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2
Schmidt, A., Röner, S., Mai, K., Klinkhammer, H., Kircher, M., & Ludwig, K. U. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad280 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Ju, Z., Zhang, J., Li, X., Xiao, H., Chen, X., Li, Y., Wang, X., & Wei, Y.
- Affiliations
- South China Agricultural University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wei, Yanjie
- Venue
- Tsinghua Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2284-2299
- ISSN
- 1007-0214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409916715
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Tsinghua Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2024A1515010133)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFA0919702)
- National Science Foundation of China (12426303)
- Key Laboratory of Quantitative Synthetic Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CKL075)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- allosteric proteins, somatic mutations, pathogenic variants, ensemble learning, disease-associated genes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review