Cited by 69Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

A Practical Survey on Zero-shot Prompt Design for In-context Learning

Open access
Columbia University, New York City, USA, Li, Yinheng·2023·Proceedings of the Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Large Language Models for Natural Language Processings

Abstract

The remarkable advancements in large language models (LLMs) have brought about significant improvements in Natural Language Processing(NLP) tasks.This paper presents a comprehensive review of in-context learning techniques, focusing on different types of prompts, including discrete, continuous, fewshot, and zero-shot, and their impact on LLM performance.We explore various approaches to prompt design, such as manual design, optimization algorithms, and evaluation methods, to optimize LLM performance across diverse tasks.Our review covers key research studies in prompt engineering, discussing their methodologies and contributions to the field.We also delve into the challenges faced in evaluating prompt performance, given the absence of a single "best" prompt and the importance of considering multiple metrics.In conclusion, the paper highlights the critical role of prompt design in harnessing the full potential of LLMs and provides insights into the combination of manual design, optimization techniques, and rigorous evaluation for more effective and efficient use of LLMs in various NLP tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_069

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Xiao Liu, Yanan Zheng, Zhengxiao Du, Ming Ding, Yujie Qian, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2021b. GPT understands, too. CoRR, abs/2103.10385. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Columbia University, N. Y. C., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Yinheng
Venue
Proceedings of the Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Large Language Models for Natural Language Processings
Published
2023
Pages
641-647
ISSN
1313-8502 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387074826
Cited by
68
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
12.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International conference Recent advances in natural language processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
in-context learning, prompt engineering, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review