Ethnic/Race Differences in Aptitude by Generation in the United States: An Exploratory Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive ability differences between racial/ethnic groups are of interest to social scientists and policy makers. In many discussions of group differences, racial/ethnic groups are treated as monolithic wholes. However, subpopulations within these broad categories need not perform as the racial/ethnic groups do on average. Such subpopulation differences potentially have theoretical import when it comes to causal explanations of racial/ethnic differentials. As no meta-analysis has previously been conducted on the topic, we investigated the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences by migrant generations (first, second, and third+). We conducted an exploratory meta-analysis using 18 samples for which we were able to decompose scores by sociologically defined race/ethnicity and immigrant generation. For Blacks and Whites of the same generation, the first, second, and third+ generation B/W d-values were 0.79, 0.79, and 1.00. For Hispanics and Whites of the same generation, the first, second, and third+ generation H/W d-values were 0.76, 0.67, and 0.57. For Asians and Whites of the same generation, the first, second, and third+ generation d-values were -0.08, -0.21, and 0.00. Relative to third+ generation Whites, the average d-values were 0.99, 0.84, and 1.00 for first, second, and third+ generation Black individuals, 1.04, 0.71, and 0.57 for first, second, and third+ generation Hispanic individuals, 0.16, -0.18, and -0.01 for first, second, and third+ generation Asian individuals, and 0.24 and 0.04 for first and second generation Whites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Korstange, G. (1988) · The English Journal · doi:10.2307/818631 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-Selection and International Migration: New Evidence from Mexico
Kaestner, R. J., & Malamud, O. (2013) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00375 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
West Indian Immigrants: A Black Success Story?
Model, S. W. (2008) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Asian American and Pacific Islander Students
Pang, V. O., Han, P. P., & Pang, J. M. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-62396-215-920251003 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Tracking Intergenerational Progress for Immigrant Groups: The Problem of Ethnic Attrition
Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.603 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
African cognitive ability: Research, results, divergences and recommendations
Rindermann, H. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.022 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Fuerst, J. G. R., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2014) · Open Differential Psychology · doi:10.26775/odp.2014.04.18 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationTrundt, K. M. (2013) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Fuerst, J.
- Corresponding author
- Fuerst, John
- ORCID
- Fuerst, John
- Venue
- Open Differential Psychology
- Publisher
- OpenPsych
- Published
- 2014-07-26
- ISSN
- 2446-3884 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W162159712
- Semantic Scholar
- 650d1235714821c9e0e9fea7f60b420bec39d45a
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Open Differential Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- racial and ethnic differences, cognitive ability, immigrant generations, intergenerational differences, subpopulation differences, black-white disparities, immigrant subgroups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review