CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits

McRae, Brad H., Hall, Sonia A., Beier, Paul, Theobald, David M.·2012·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604PMC PMC3531461
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. P Taylor, 1993, Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure, Oikos, 68, 571, 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  2. TH Ricketts, 2001, The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes, The American Naturalist, 158, 87, 10.1086/320863 · DOI
  3. P Kareiva, 1995, Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes, Nature, 373, 299, 10.1038/373299a0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A Moilanen, 2002, Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology, Ecology, 83, 1131, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:SCMISE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (2006) Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 712 p. · DOI
  6. EI Damschen, 2006, Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales, Science, 313, 1284, 10.1126/science.1130098 · DOI
  7. NE Heller, 2009, Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations, Biological Conservation, 142, 14, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Singleton P, Gaines W, Lehmkuhl J (2002) Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted distance and least-cost corridor assessment. Research Paper PNW-RP-549. Portland, Oregon. 89 p. Available: http://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/51864782.pdf. Accessed 2012 Nov 29. · DOI
  9. Baldwin RF, Perkl RM, Trombulak SC, Burwell WB (2010) Modeling Ecoregional Connectivity. In: Trombulak SC, Baldwin RF, editors. Landscape-scale Conservation Planning. Houten, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. pp. 349–367. · DOI
  10. JP Knaapen, 1992, Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 23, 1, 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D · DOI
  11. F Adriaensen, 2003, The application of “least-cost” modelling as a functional landscape model, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. WW Hargrove, 2005, A practical map-analysis tool for detecting potential dispersal corridors, Landscape Ecology, 20, 361, 10.1007/s10980-004-3162-y · DOI
  13. Tracey JA (2006) Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M, editors. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 343–368. · DOI
  14. AG Bunn, 2000, Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory, Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 265, 10.1006/jema.2000.0373 · DOI
  15. D Urban, 2001, Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  16. C Carroll, 2012, Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America, Conservation Biology, 26, 78, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x · DOI
  17. DM Theobald, 2012, Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States, Conservation Letters, 5, 123, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00218.x · DOI
  18. Breckheimer I (2012) Mapping Habitat Quality in Conservation's Neglected Geography. M.S. Thesis, Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  19. L Tischendorf, 2000, How should we measure landscape connectivity?, Landscape Ecology, 15, 633, 10.1023/A:1008177324187 · DOI
  20. R Baldwin, 2012, Connectivity restoration in large landscapes: modeling landscape condition and ecological flows, Ecological Restoration, 30, 274, 10.3368/er.30.4.274 · DOI
  21. CR Margules, 2000, Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 243, 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Possingham HP, Ball I, Andelman S (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S, Burgman M, editors. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 291–305. · DOI
  23. KA Wilson, 2007, Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when, PLOS biology, 5, e223, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050223 · DOI
  24. JR Thomson, 2009, Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction, Ecological Applications, 19, 817, 10.1890/08-0915.1 · DOI
  25. MR Lethbridge, 2010, Optimal restoration of altered habitats, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 737, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.013 · DOI
  26. MF McBride, 2010, Mathematical problem definition for ecological restoration planning, Ecological Modelling, 221, 2243, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.012 · DOI
  27. P Beier, 2008, Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages, Conservation Biology, 22, 836, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. P Beier, 2011, Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps, Conservation Biology, 25, 879, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. KA Zeller, 2012, Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review, Landscape Ecology, 27, 777, 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · DOI · Paper page
  30. CH Graham, 2001, Factors Influencing Movement Patterns of Keel-Billed Toucans in a Fragmented Tropical Landscape in Southern Mexico, Conservation Biology, 15, 1789, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00070.x · DOI
  31. JP Chardon, 2003, Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.), Landscape Ecology, 18, 561, 10.1023/A:1026062530600 · DOI
  32. MK Schwartz, 2009, Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche, Ecology, 90, 3222, 10.1890/08-1287.1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. SA Cushman, 2006, Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling, The American Naturalist, 168, 486, 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  34. N Pinto, 2008, Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach, Landscape Ecology, 24, 253, 10.1007/s10980-008-9303-y · DOI · Paper page
  35. E Estrada, 2008, Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity, Ecological Applications, 18, 1810, 10.1890/07-1419.1 · DOI
  36. EL Landguth, 2011, UNICOR: a species connectivity and corridor network simulator, Ecography, 35, 9, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07149.x · DOI
  37. P Beier, 2009, Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages, Ecological Applications, 19, 2067, 10.1890/08-1898.1 · DOI · Paper page
  38. SF Spear, 2010, Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis, Molecular ecology, 19, 3576, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. EC Underwood, 2008, Protecting biodiversity when money matters: maximizing return on investment, PLOS ONE, 3, e1515, 10.1371/journal.pone.0001515 · DOI
  40. S Polasky, 2008, Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns, Biological Conservation, 141, 1505, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022 · DOI
  41. A Moilanen, 2005, Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems, Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society, 272, 1885, 10.1098/rspb.2005.3164 · DOI · Paper page
  42. DK Rosenberg, 1997, Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy, BioScience, 47, 677, 10.2307/1313208 · DOI
  43. Doyle P, Snell J (1984) Random walks and electric networks. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America. 159 p. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Blaauw D, Pant S, Chaudhry R, Panda R (2005) Design and Analysis of Power Supply Networks. In: Lavagno L, Martin G, Sheffer L, editors. Electronic Design Automation for Integrated Circuits Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  45. Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 428 p. · DOI
  46. Possingham HP, Wilson KA, Andelman SJ, Vynne CH (2006) Protected areas: goals, limitations, and design. In: Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll C., editors. Principles of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. pp. 509–533.
  47. R Briers, 2002, Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures, Biological Conservation, 103, 77, 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00123-9 · DOI
  48. A Arponen, 2012, Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents, Conservation biology: the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 26, 294, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01814.x · DOI
  49. M Cabeza, 2003, Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design, Ecology Letters, 6, 665, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00475.x · DOI
  50. A Moilanen, 2007, Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies, Biological Conservation, 134, 571, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.008 · DOI
  51. MI Westphal, 2007, Optimizing landscape configuration: A case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia, Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 56, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.015 · DOI
  52. Moilanen A, Possingham HP, Polasky S (2009) A mathematical classification of conservation prioritisation problems. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, editors. Spatial Conservation Prioritization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 28–42. · DOI
  53. A Moilanen, 2011, Spatial prioritization of conservation management, Conservation Letters, 4, 383, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00190.x · DOI
  54. MW Schwartz, 1999, Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 83, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.83 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McRae, B. H., Hall, S. A., Beier, P., & Theobald, D. M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e52604
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0052604
PMC
PMC3531461
Cited by
361
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review