Cited by 53Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsNF-κB Signaling PathwaysGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Of alphas and betas: distinct and overlapping functions of STAT3 isoforms

Open access
Dewilde, Sarah·2008·Frontiers in Bioscience

Abstract

STAT3 is a pleiotropic factor activated by many different signals including cytokines, growth factors and oncogenes. It is involved in a striking number of functions and can activate distinct repertoires of genes in different contexts. Like other STAT factors, STAT3 exists in two isoforms generated by alternative splicing, the full length STAT3alpha and the truncated STAT3beta, generally thought to act as a dominant negative factor. However, STAT3beta is not transcriptionally inactive and is able to both activate and repress genes depending on cellular environment. These unique properties of the STAT3beta isoform may contribute to the extraordinary functional complexity of STAT3 physiological and pathological actions, revealed by conditional mutagenesis studies and not yet fully understood. With this in mind, we try here to summarize what is known about the structure and function of the alpha and beta STAT3 isoforms, both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we report unpublished data describing the phenotype of mice where the STAT3alpha isoform was specifically ablated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2741/3170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dewilde, S.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Dewilde, Sarah
Venue
Frontiers in Bioscience
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2008
Volume
Volume
Issue
13
Pages
6501
ISSN
  • 1093-4715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1093-9946
OpenAlex
W1964416733
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in bioscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
STAT3, STAT3β, alternative splicing, dominant negative regulation, gene activation and repression, transcriptional regulation, conditional mutagenesis, cytokine signaling, oncogene signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Recombinant Proteins, Cytokines, Alternative Splicing, Mice, Knockout, Protein Isoforms, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review