Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Training methods for horses: habituation to a frightening stimulus

CHRISTENSEN, J. W., RUNDGREN, M., OLSSON, K.·2006·Equine Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Summary: Reasons for performing study : Responses of horses in frightening situations are important for both equine and human safety. Considerable scientific interest has been shown in development of reactivity tests, but little effort has been dedicated to the development of appropriate training methods for reducing fearfulness. Objectives : To investigate which of 3 different training methods (habituation, desensitisation and counter‐conditioning) was most effective in teaching horses to react calmly in a potentially frightening situation. Hypotheses : 1) Horses are able to generalise about the test stimulus such that, once familiar with the test stimulus in one situation, it appears less frightening and elicits a reduced response even when the stimulus intensity is increased or the stimulus is presented differently; and 2) alternative methods such as desensitisation and counter‐conditioning would be more efficient than a classic habituation approach. Methods : Twenty‐seven naïve 2‐year‐old Danish Warmblood stallions were trained according to 3 different methods, based on classical learning theory: 1) horses (n = 9) were exposed to the full stimulus (a moving, white nylon bag, 1.2 times 0.75 m) in 5 daily training sessions until they met a predefined habituation criterion (habituation); 2) horses (n = 9) were introduced gradually to the stimulus and habituated to each step before the full stimulus was applied (desensitisation); 3) horses (n = 9) were trained to associate the stimulus with a positive reward before being exposed to the full stimulus (counter‐conditioning). Each horse received 5 training sessions of 3 min per day. Heart rate and behavioural responses were recorded. Results : Horses trained with the desensitisation method showed fewer flight responses in total and needed fewer training sessions to learn to react calmly to test stimuli. Variations in heart rate persisted even when behavioural responses had ceased. In addition, all horses on the desensitisation method eventually habituated to the test stimulus whereas some horses on the other methods did not. Conclusions and potential relevance : Desensitisation appeared to be the most effective training method for horses in frightening situations. Further research is needed in order to investigate the role of positive reinforcement, such as offering food, in the training of horses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2746/042516406778400574

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.017 · DOI
  2. Cooper J.J., 1998, Comparative learning theory and its application in the training of horses, Equine vet. J., 27, 39, 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05144.x · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.363 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00004-0 · DOI
  5. Keeling L.J., 1999, Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the ISAE, 86
  6. 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.021 · DOI
  7. McGreevy P., 2005, The Domestic Horse, 196
  8. 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00093-X · DOI
  9. Nicol C.J., 2005, The Domestic Horse, 169
  10. 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00095-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00177-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00104.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00784-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
CHRISTENSEN, J. W., RUNDGREN, M., & OLSSON, K.
Venue
Equine Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
439-443
ISSN
  • 0425-1644
  • 2042-3306
Cited by
71
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review