The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Training methods for horses: habituation to a frightening stimulus
Abstract
Summary: Reasons for performing study : Responses of horses in frightening situations are important for both equine and human safety. Considerable scientific interest has been shown in development of reactivity tests, but little effort has been dedicated to the development of appropriate training methods for reducing fearfulness. Objectives : To investigate which of 3 different training methods (habituation, desensitisation and counter‐conditioning) was most effective in teaching horses to react calmly in a potentially frightening situation. Hypotheses : 1) Horses are able to generalise about the test stimulus such that, once familiar with the test stimulus in one situation, it appears less frightening and elicits a reduced response even when the stimulus intensity is increased or the stimulus is presented differently; and 2) alternative methods such as desensitisation and counter‐conditioning would be more efficient than a classic habituation approach. Methods : Twenty‐seven naïve 2‐year‐old Danish Warmblood stallions were trained according to 3 different methods, based on classical learning theory: 1) horses (n = 9) were exposed to the full stimulus (a moving, white nylon bag, 1.2 times 0.75 m) in 5 daily training sessions until they met a predefined habituation criterion (habituation); 2) horses (n = 9) were introduced gradually to the stimulus and habituated to each step before the full stimulus was applied (desensitisation); 3) horses (n = 9) were trained to associate the stimulus with a positive reward before being exposed to the full stimulus (counter‐conditioning). Each horse received 5 training sessions of 3 min per day. Heart rate and behavioural responses were recorded. Results : Horses trained with the desensitisation method showed fewer flight responses in total and needed fewer training sessions to learn to react calmly to test stimuli. Variations in heart rate persisted even when behavioural responses had ceased. In addition, all horses on the desensitisation method eventually habituated to the test stimulus whereas some horses on the other methods did not. Conclusions and potential relevance : Desensitisation appeared to be the most effective training method for horses in frightening situations. Further research is needed in order to investigate the role of positive reinforcement, such as offering food, in the training of horses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Horse-riding is ranked as one of the most dangerous sports due to high accident frequency rates and the severity of human injuries.
“with horse-riding ranked as one of the most dangerous sports due to high accident frequency rates and the severity of human injuries [8,9].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.017 · DOI
- Cooper J.J., 1998, Comparative learning theory and its application in the training of horses, Equine vet. J., 27, 39, 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05144.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.363 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00004-0 · DOI
- Keeling L.J., 1999, Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the ISAE, 86
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.021 · DOI
- McGreevy P., 2005, The Domestic Horse, 196
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00093-X · DOI
- Nicol C.J., 2005, The Domestic Horse, 169
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00095-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00177-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00104.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00784-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- CHRISTENSEN, J. W., RUNDGREN, M., & OLSSON, K.
- Venue
- Equine Veterinary Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 439-443
- ISSN
- 0425-1644
- 2042-3306
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review