Cited by 163Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAvian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Physiological and Behavioral Differences in Magellanic Penguin Chicks in Undisturbed and Tourist‐Visited Locations of a Colony

WALKER, BRIAN G., BOERSMA, P. DEE, WINGFIELD, JOHN C.·2005·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Studies examining anthropogenic effects on wildlife typically focus on adults and on behavioral responses rather than the physiological consequences of human disturbances. Here we examined how Magellanic Penguin ( Spheniscus magellanicus ) chicks living in either tourist‐visited or undisturbed areas of a breeding colony were affected by human visitation by comparing the baseline and stress‐induced levels of corticosterone during three periods of the breeding season. Newly hatched chicks in visited areas had higher corticosterone stress responses than newly hatched chicks in undisturbed areas ( p = 0.007), but baseline levels were similar ( p = 0.61). By 40–50 days of age and around fledging time, both visited and undisturbed chicks showed a robust corticosterone stress response to capture. Tourist‐visited chicks did not flee when approached by humans, however, whereas undisturbed chicks fled significantly sooner (i.e., when approached no closer than 9 m; p < 0.0001). Although it is unknown whether Magellanic Penguin chicks raised in visited areas suffer negative consequences from the elevation of the corticosterone stress response at hatching, they do exhibit behavioral habituation to human contact by the time they are ready to fledge. Unlike adults living in tourist areas, however, fledging chicks in visited areas do not have a decreased stress response to capture and restraint. Our results show that the coupling of behavioral and physiological habituation in Magellanic Penguins is complex and life‐history context may greatly affect the ability of wildlife to adapt to anthropogenic disturbances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00104.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boersma P. D., 1991, Acta XX Congressus Internationialis Ornighologici, 961
  2. SAS Institute, 1998, SAS Institute
  3. Walker B. G., 2002, Developmental and nutritional aspects of the adrenocortical stress response in free‐living Magellanic Penguin chicks, Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42, 1330
  4. Wingfield J. C., 1994, Perspectives in comparative endocrinology, 520

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WALKER, B. G., BOERSMA, P. D., & WINGFIELD, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
WALKER, BRIAN G.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-16
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1571-1577
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2016264455
Cited by
163
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Magellanic penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus, penguin chicks, tourist disturbance, human disturbance, corticosterone, stress response, habituation, flight behavior, fledging, breeding colonies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review