The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind
Abstract
Animals are used by humans in many ways, yet science has paid little attention to the study of human–animal relationships (Melson 2002). In the present study, participants (n= 96) completed a questionnaire on attitudes towards animal use, and individual differences were examined to determine which characteristics might underlie these attitudes (“belief in animal mind,” age, gender, experience of animals, vegetarianism, political stance, and living area). It emerged that participants held different views for different types of animal use, and that belief in animal mind (BAM) was a powerful and consistent predictor of these attitudes, with BAM together with gender and vegetarianism predicting up to 37% of the variance in attitudes towards animal use. Thus, future research should acknowledge the importance of BAM as a major underlying factor of attitudes towards animal use, and should also distinguish between different types of animal use when measuring attitudes. We propose that the large effect of BAM might be due to increasing interest in animal mind over the past decade.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Belief in the animal mind is a good predictor of attitudes towards animals and their use and abuse for human benefit.
“Belief in the animal mind appears to be a good predictor of attitudes towards animals and their use and abuse for the benefit of humans (e.g., entertainment, experimentation and financial gain [60,61]).”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people's attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for.
“These factors appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people’s attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for [12,13,27,60,61].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00433.x · DOI
- Allport G.W., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice., 38, 267
- Armstrong J.B., 1996, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1003, 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.1003 · DOI
- Baron-Cohen S., 2003, The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain.
- Baron-Cohen S., 1994, Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism.
- Baron-Cohen S., 2002, The Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, 491, 10.1002/9780470996652.ch22 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00589.x · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011575 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
- 10.1080/0305569850110101 · DOI
- Field A., 2000, Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows.
- Furnham A., 1990, The Psychologist, 444
- 10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1 · DOI
- Gilligan C., 1982, In a Different Voice.
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01126.x · DOI
- 10.1037/h0055425 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
- Herzog H.A., 2000, Society and Animals, 8, 183, 10.1163/156853000511078 · DOI
- Herzog H.A., 1997, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes and Animals, 237
- 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
- Hunt, M. 2000, December 18. New Labour tries to run with the fox and hunt with the hounds. The Times: Internet Edition [Online]. Available: http://www.the-times.co.uk [Accessed: 2001, October 9].
- Kafer R., 1992, Anthrozoös, 5, 93, 10.2752/089279392787011476 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00364.x · DOI
- Kellert S.R., 1981, Knowledge, Affection and Basic Attitudes Toward Animals in American Society.
- Kellert S.R., 1987, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15, 363
- 10.1080/00224540109600582 · DOI
- Lieberman A., 1996, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 269, 10.1177/0146167296223005 · DOI
- Matthews S., 1997, Society and Animals, 5, 169, 10.1163/156853097X00060 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x · DOI
- Paul E. S., 1993, Animal Welfare, 2, 321, 10.1017/S0962728600016109 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02936346 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853094X00126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00388.x · DOI
- Rajecki D.W., 1993, Society and Animals, 1, 45, 10.1163/156853093X00145 · DOI
- Smith E.R., 1995, Social Psychology.
- 10.1163/156853097X00213 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Masterton, M., Renberg, T., & Kälvemark Sporrong, S. (2014) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.39 · Cited by 21
Makecha, R. N., Phalke, S., & Nakai, Y. (2022) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2021.1902812 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, S., Vrij, A., Cherryman, J., & Nunkoosing, K.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-62
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review