Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind

Knight, Sarah, Vrij, Aldert, Cherryman, Julie, Nunkoosing, Karl·2004·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Animals are used by humans in many ways, yet science has paid little attention to the study of human–animal relationships (Melson 2002). In the present study, participants (n= 96) completed a questionnaire on attitudes towards animal use, and individual differences were examined to determine which characteristics might underlie these attitudes (“belief in animal mind,” age, gender, experience of animals, vegetarianism, political stance, and living area). It emerged that participants held different views for different types of animal use, and that belief in animal mind (BAM) was a powerful and consistent predictor of these attitudes, with BAM together with gender and vegetarianism predicting up to 37% of the variance in attitudes towards animal use. Thus, future research should acknowledge the importance of BAM as a major underlying factor of attitudes towards animal use, and should also distinguish between different types of animal use when measuring attitudes. We propose that the large effect of BAM might be due to increasing interest in animal mind over the past decade.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/089279304786991945

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00433.x · DOI
  2. Allport G.W., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice., 38, 267
  3. Armstrong J.B., 1996, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1003, 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.1003 · DOI
  4. Baron-Cohen S., 2003, The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain.
  5. Baron-Cohen S., 1994, Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism.
  6. Baron-Cohen S., 2002, The Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, 491, 10.1002/9780470996652.ch22 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00589.x · DOI
  8. 10.2752/089279392787011575 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
  10. 10.1080/0305569850110101 · DOI
  11. Field A., 2000, Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows.
  12. Furnham A., 1990, The Psychologist, 444
  13. 10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1 · DOI
  14. Gilligan C., 1982, In a Different Voice.
  15. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01126.x · DOI
  16. 10.1037/h0055425 · DOI
  17. 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
  18. Herzog H.A., 2000, Society and Animals, 8, 183, 10.1163/156853000511078 · DOI
  19. Herzog H.A., 1997, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes and Animals, 237
  20. 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hunt, M. 2000, December 18. New Labour tries to run with the fox and hunt with the hounds. The Times: Internet Edition [Online]. Available: http://www.the-times.co.uk [Accessed: 2001, October 9].
  22. Kafer R., 1992, Anthrozoös, 5, 93, 10.2752/089279392787011476 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00364.x · DOI
  24. Kellert S.R., 1981, Knowledge, Affection and Basic Attitudes Toward Animals in American Society.
  25. Kellert S.R., 1987, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15, 363
  26. 10.1080/00224540109600582 · DOI
  27. Lieberman A., 1996, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 269, 10.1177/0146167296223005 · DOI
  28. Matthews S., 1997, Society and Animals, 5, 169, 10.1163/156853097X00060 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x · DOI
  30. Paul E. S., 1993, Animal Welfare, 2, 321, 10.1017/S0962728600016109 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/BF02936346 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367 · DOI
  33. 10.1163/156853094X00126 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00388.x · DOI
  35. Rajecki D.W., 1993, Society and Animals, 1, 45, 10.1163/156853093X00145 · DOI
  36. Smith E.R., 1995, Social Psychology.
  37. 10.1163/156853097X00213 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Knight, S., Vrij, A., Cherryman, J., & Nunkoosing, K.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2004-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
43-62
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
212
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review