The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Companion Animals as Selfobjects
Abstract
This research examined whether self psychology could be systematically applied to human–animal relationships. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted, which consisted of 16 questions designed to illuminate selfobject needs. The interviews were intended to identify whether the horse/dog/cat/rabbit was a selfobject, that is, a provider of self-cohesion, self esteem, calmness, soothing, and acceptance, for the participant and, if so, whether the primary type(s) of selfobject was mirroring, idealizing, or twinship. Results revealed that self psychology could be applied successfully to human–animal relationships, that it could usually be determined whether the animal served a selfobject function, and that selfobject type was generally able to be established. In this sample, animals rivaled and even surpassed humans in their ability to provide important selfobject needs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Keeping pets as an extension of the self implies that they are seen as expressions of the individual’s identity and as part of the person, and thus remaining without them is not conceivable; seeing animals as part of the self involves having an emotional attachment towards them and not just a functional one [97,98].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alper L.S., 1993, The Widening Scope of Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, 9, 257
- Bacal, H.A. and Newman, K. 1990.Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology.New York: Columbia University Press.
- Brown S.E., 2004, Society & Animals, 12, 67, 10.1163/156853004323029540 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown S.E., 1997, DISSOCIATION, 10, 125
- Brown S.E., 2001, Society & Animals, 9, 25, 10.1163/156853001300108973 · DOI · Paper page
- Kohut, H. 1984.How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
- Silverstein, M.L. 1999.Self Psychology and Diagnostic Assessment: Identifying Selfobject Functions through Psychological Testing.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. · DOI
- Wolf, E.S. 1988.Treating the Self: Elements of Clinical Self Psychology.New York: The Guilford Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Companion Animals and Child/Adolescent Development: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Purewal, R., Christley, R., Kordas, K., Joinson, C., Meints, K., Gee, N., & Westgarth, C. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14030234 · Cited by 302
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Hauge, H., Kvalem, I. L., Enders-Slegers, M.-J., Berget, B., & Braastad, B. O. (2015) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.11435406 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, S.-E.
- Affiliations
- Center for the Study of Human-Animal Interdependent Relationships, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 329-343
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review