Cited by 19Human-Animal Interaction StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and Perception

Dogs Look Like Their Owners: Replications with Racially Homogenous Owner Portraits

Nakajima, Sadahiko, Yamamoto, Mariko, Yoshimoto, Natsumi·2009·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Previous studies conducted in the United States and Venezuela have demonstrated that people can correctly match portraits of unknown purebred dogs with their owners at statistically significant levels, suggesting that the popular belief in dog–owner physical resemblance is empirically valid. We investigated the perceived physical resemblance of dog–owner pairs in Japan, where the owners are racially more homogenous than in the countries in which the previous studies were conducted. In experiment 1, the matching performance by naïve judges was statistically significant, and a supplementary test suggested that perceived dog–owner physical resemblance plays a critical role in this. Experiment 2 presented a new procedure to test the perceived dog–owner physical resemblance and demonstrated that two-thirds of the judges selected a set of 20 real dog–owner pairs over a set of 20 fake dog–owner pairs, irrespective of whether it was an ownership-guessing task or a resemblance-based choice task. The ability to match correct dog–owner pairs (experiment 1) and the sensitivity to differentiate between real and fake dog–owner pairs (experiment 2) were not unique to the characteristics of the judges (e.g., whether or not they were dog lovers) because the task performance was independent of any measured judge-related factor. These results, taken together, provide another piece of positive evidence for the popular belief that there is a physical resemblance between dogs and their owners. Furthermore, the demonstration of dog–owner physical resemblance with racially homogeneous owner samples supports the generality and robustness of this phenomenon. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon (i.e., owners' selection of dogs that look like themselves or the convergence of appearance over time), however, remains to be elucidated by future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303709x434194

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The resemblance between humans and their dogs is due to long-term cohabitation and communication, resulting in the two partners having the same gaze.

    “Another study shows that the reason why humans and their dogs look alike is due to their long-term cohabitation and communication, which results in the two partners having the same gaze (Nakajima, Yamamoto, and Yoshimoto 2009).”

    From The Dog-Eared Dictionary: Human-Animal Alliance in Chinese Civilization (2015) · cites this paper as Nakajima, Yamamoto, and Yoshimoto 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakajima, S., Yamamoto, M., & Yoshimoto, N.
Affiliations
Kwansei Gakuin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakajima, Sadahiko
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2009-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
173-181
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W1996357771
Cited by
19
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
racial homogeneity, cross-cultural generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review