The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audience Response to Product Placements: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda
Abstract
This study comprehensively reviews the literature on product placements to develop an integrative conceptual model that captures how such messages generate audience outcomes. The model depicts four components: execution/stimulus factors (e.g., program type, execution flexibility, opportunity to process, placement modality, placement priming); individual-specific factors (e.g., brand familiarity, judgment of placement fit, attitudes toward placements, involvement/connectedness with program); processing depth (degree of conscious processing); and message outcomes that reflect placement effectiveness. The execution and individual factors influence processing depth (portrayed as a high—low continuum), which in turn impacts message outcomes. The outcomes are organized around the hierarchy-of-effects model into three broad categories: cognition (e.g., memory-related measures such as recognition and recall); affect (e.g., attitudes); and conation (e.g., purchase intention, purchase behavior). This study integrates potential main and interaction effects among model variables to advance a series of theoretical propositions. It also offers an extensive research agenda of conceptual and empirical issues that future work can address.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Impression management: A literature review and two-component model.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34 · Cited by 3,334
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198 · Cited by 250
Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2002) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673683 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Campbell, M. C., Mohr, G. S., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.012 · Cited by 234
Sidedness, commercial intent and expertise in blog advertising
Uribe, R., Buzeta, C., & Velásquez, M. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.102 · Cited by 109
Gong, W., Ye, W., & Yu, S. (2024) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19040156 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Balasubramanian, S. K., Karrh, J. A., & Patwardhan, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 115-141
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W2073515916
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 38.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audience Response to Product Placements: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/joa0091-3367350308
- The paper
- Balasubramanian, S. K., Karrh, J. A., & Patwardhan, H. (2006). Audience Response to Product Placements: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Advertising. https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367350308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.