CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 505Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social MediaPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies

Lim, Kai H., Sia, Choon Ling, Lee, Matthew K.O., Benbasat, Izak·2006·Journal of Management Information Systems
DOI 10.2753/mis0742-1222230210
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigates the effectiveness of various trust-building strategies to influence actual buying behavior in online shopping environments, particularly for first-time visitors to an Internet store that does not have an established reputation. Drawing from the literature on trust, we developed a model of how trust-building strategies could affect trust and the consequences of trust. We investigated two trust-building strategies: portal association (based on reputation categorization and trust transference) and satisfied customer endorsements (based on unit grouping, reputation categorization, and trust transference). A series of two studies was conducted at a large public university in Hong Kong. The first study employed a laboratory experiment to test the model in an online bookstore environment, using a real task that involves actual book purchases. Of the two strategies investigated, satisfied customer endorsement by similar peers, but not portal association, was found to increase consumers' trusting beliefs about the store. This, in turn, positively influenced consumers' attitudes toward the store and their willingness to buy from the store, which ultimately led to actual buying behaviors. To gather further insights on the two Web strategies investigated, a second study was conducted using a questionnaire survey approach. Overall, the findings corroborated those in the first study. Specifically, it shows that endorsements by similar (local, nonforeign) peers, but not by dissimilar (foreign) peers, were effective means of developing trust among first-time visitors to online stores.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2753/mis0742-1222230210

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Barclay, D.; Higgins, C.A.; and Thompson, R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology 2, 2 (1995), 285-324.
  2. Berkowitz, E.N.; Kerin, R.A.; Hartley, S.W.; and Rudelins, W. Marketing, 5th ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  3. Brewer, M.B. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M.B. Brewer and B.E. Collins (eds.)Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981, pp. 345-360.
  4. Kelley, H.H. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist 6, 2 (1973), 107-112.
  5. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  6. Ring, S.M., and Van de Ven, A.H. Structuring cooperating relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13, 7 (1992), 483-498.
  7. Swan, J.E., and Nolan, J.J. Gaining customer trust: A conceptual guide for the salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 5, 2 (November 1985), 39-47.
  8. Wold, H. Systems under indirect observation using PLS. In C. Fornell (ed.)A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis Methods, vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1982, pp. 325-347.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 505

Related

Metadata

Authors
Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K. O., & Benbasat, I.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-10
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
233-266
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
DOI
10.2753/mis0742-1222230210
OpenAlex
W2083365829
Cited by
505
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 30
FWCI
40.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
online trust, trust-building strategies, online shopping, first-time visitors, online store, peer similarity, reputation, purchase intention, online bookstores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review