The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, trust has been seen as a result of personal knowledge of an individual's past behavior. In this view, trust develops gradually over time based on an individual's cognitive assessment of the other person's behavior. However, high levels of trust have been observed among members of virtual teams, who often have little prior history of working together and may never meet each other in person. To integrate these two seemingly contradictory views of trust, this study manipulated team member characteristics and team member behavior to empirically test a two-stage theoretical model of trust formation and the influence of information and communication technologies (ICT) on trust formation. The results indicate that category-based processing of team member characteristics and an individual's own disposition to trust dominated the initial formation of swift trust. Once individuals accumulated sufficient information to assess a team member's trustworthiness, the effects of swift trust declined and knowledge-based trust formed using team members' behaviors (perceived ability, integrity, and benevolence) became dominant. The use of ICT increased perceived risk of team failure, which reduced the likelihood that team members would engage in future trusting behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Teams that interact virtually are considerably less likely to develop trust [216].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [216]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, in accordance with similarity/attraction theory, team members attribute positive traits to team members that they believe are similar to themselves and prefer to interact with them [216,255].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [216]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
(1998) · Cited by 12,725
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5167 · Cited by 10,800
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [15]15. brewer, M.b. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M.b. brewer and b.E. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-bass, 1981, pp. 214-231.
- [25]25. Chen, S., and Chaiken, S. the heuristic semantic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken and Y. trope (eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social and Cognitive Psychology. New York: guilford, 1999, pp. 73-96.
- [33]33. Daft, R.L.; Lengel, R.H.; and trevino, L. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3 (1987), 355-366.
- [45]45. Fiske, S.t.; Lin, M.; and Neuberg, S.L. the continuum model: ten years later. In S. Chaiken and Y. trope (eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social and Cognitive Psychology. New York: guilford Press, 1999, pp. 231-254.
- [56]56. Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; and Willis, H. Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1 (2002), 575-604.
- [60]60. Ichijo, K.; von Krogh, g.; and Nonaka, I. Knowledge enablers. In g. von Krogh, J. Roos, and D. Kleine (eds.), Knowing in Firms: Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge. London: Sage, 2000, pp. 173-203.
- [73]73. Komiak, S.Y.X., and benbasat, I. the effects of internalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 941-960.
- [84]84. In R.M. Kramer and t.R. tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 114-139.
- [93]93. March, J.g. A Primer on Decision Making. New York: Free Press, 1994.
- [107]107. In S. Chaiken and Y. trope (eds.), Dual-Process Theories in Social and Cognitive Psychology. New York: guilford, 1999, pp. 529-546. 122.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 512
Guo, W., Straub, D. W., Zhang, P., & Cai, Z. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/14349 · Cited by 41
Ou, C. X., Zhang, X., Angelopoulos, S. P., Davison, R. M., & Janse, N. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102498 · Cited by 41
Kim, J., Muhic, J., Robert, L., & Park, S. Y. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502116 · Cited by 41
Self-citationYao, Q., Baker, L. T., & Lohrke, F. T. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.046 · Cited by 47
Midha, V., & Nandedkar, A. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.013 · Cited by 41
Can virtuality be protective of team trust? Conflict and effectiveness in hybrid teams
Alves, M. P., Dimas, I. D., Lourenço, P. R., Rebelo, T., Peñarroja, V., & Gamero, N. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2046163 · Cited by 50
A qualitative systematic review of trust in technology
Schuetz, S. W., Kuai, L., Lacity, M. C., & Steelman, Z. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962241254392 · Cited by 47
Knowledge Sharing as Social Exchange: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
Liu, C., Liang, T., Rajagopalan, B., Sambamurthy, V., & Wu, J. C.-H. (2011) · Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1pais.03402 · Cited by 40
Investor Intention in Equity Crowdfunding. Does Trust Matter?
Alharbey, M., & Almazor, E. V. H. (2021) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14020053 · Cited by 50
Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Dennis, A., & Riemer, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.574 · Cited by 38
Jensen, T., Khan, M. M. H., Albayram, Y., Fahim, M., Buck, R. W., & Coman, E. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1642616 · Cited by 40
What makes an effective team? The role of trust (dis)confirmation in team development
Yang, I. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.04.001 · Cited by 42
A multi-level analysis of the impact of shared leadership in diverse virtual teams
Robert, L. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441818 · Cited by 37
Self-citationMonitoring and Trust in Virtual Teams
Robert, L. (2016) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2818048.2820076 · Cited by 43
Self-citationYou, S., & Robert, L. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.031 · Cited by 37
Self-citationDeterminants of online trust and their impact on online purchase intention
Kooli, K., Mansour, K. B., & Utama, R. (2014) · International Journal of Technology Marketing · doi:10.1504/ijtmkt.2014.063858 · Cited by 43
Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Dennis, A. R., & Riemer, K. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.213 · Cited by 35
Having the Right Attitude: How Attitude Impacts Trust Repair in Human—Robot Interaction
Esterwood, C., & Robert, L. P. (2022) · 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889535 · Cited by 36
Self-citationIT’s a matter of trust: Literature reviews and analyses of human trust in information technology
Lacity, M. C., Schuetz, S. W., Kuai, L., & Steelman, Z. R. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231226397 · Cited by 52
Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view
Grießmair, M., Hussain, D., & Windsperger, J. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.01.009 · Cited by 40
Liu, M., Hull, C. E., & Hung, Y. C. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12113 · Cited by 35
Self-citationThe space between – linking trust with individual and team performance in virtual teams
Jaakson, K., Reino, A., & McClenaghan, P. (2018) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-03-2018-0024 · Cited by 55
Creating a high-performance exhibitor team: A temporary-organization perspective
He, H., Li, C., Lin, Z., & Liang, S. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.02.009 · Cited by 37
Andrade-Garda, J., de Sojo, Á. A., Ares-Casal, J., García, R., Lara, J. A., Lizcano, D., Rodríguez, S., & Suárez, S. (2018) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0483-1 · Cited by 34
Brezicha, K. F., & Fuller, E. J. (2019) · Journal of School Leadership · doi:10.1177/1052684618825087 · Cited by 38
Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 33
The contribution of social media to project management
Kanagarajoo, M. V., Fulford, R. G., & Standing, C. (2019) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-09-2018-0316 · Cited by 41
Building trust and diversity in patient-centered oncology clinical trials: An integrated model
Hurd, T. C., Kaplan, C. D., Cook, E. D., Chilton, J. A., Lytton, J., Hawk, E. T., & Jones, L. A. (2017) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774516688860 · Cited by 34
You, S., & Robert, L. (2024) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2023/17403 · Cited by 36
Self-citationGwebu, K. L., Wang, J., & Zifla, E. (2021) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.2002932 · Cited by 37
Trust building strategies for virtual leaders in the post pandemic era
Badrinarayanan, V. (2024) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2024.100126 · Cited by 50
Monitoring email to indicate project team performance and mutual attraction
Munson, S. A., Kervin, K., & Robert, L. (2014) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531628 · Cited by 30
Self-citationLiu, H. (2020) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104598 · Cited by 35
Parkinson Patients’ Initial Trust in Avatars: Theory and Evidence
Javor, A., Ransmayr, G. N., Struhal, W., & Riedl, R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165998 · Cited by 33
Williams, E. A., Donovan, J., Giles, L., & McKelfresh, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2022.2141066 · Cited by 29
Virtual Teams: A Smart Literature Review of Four Decades of Research
Kimura, T. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/8373370 · Cited by 32
Virtual Teams: Thematic Taxonomy, Constructs Model, and Future Research Directions
Alaiad, A., Alnsour, Y., & Alsharo, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2019.2929370 · Cited by 30
The role of transaction cost and trust in e-loyalty: a mixed-methods study of ride-sharing
Hou, T., Cheng, X., & Cheng, X. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2020-0005 · Cited by 34
Sasaki, M. (2019) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004390430 · Cited by 31
Subgroup Formation in Diverse Virtual Teams: The Moderating Role of Identity Leadership
Roodt, H. O. ́., Krug, H., & Otto, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722650 · Cited by 31
Rusman, E., van Bruggen, J., Sloep, P., Valcke, M., & Koper, R. (2012) · International Journal of Information Technology Project Management · doi:10.4018/jitpm.2012010102 · Cited by 29
Xia, H., Chen, J., Qiu, Y., Liu, P., & Liu, Z. F. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2305985 · Cited by 28
Consumers’ redemption behavior of recommended mobile coupons in social network sites
Tang, Q. G., Fen, L., Liu, S., & Ma, Y. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-03-2017-0234 · Cited by 33
Media synchronicity in organizational social exchange
Torro, O., Pirkkalainen, H., & Li, H. (2022) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2020-0384 · Cited by 37
Rating Friends Without Making Enemies
Adamic, L. A., Lauterbach, D., Teng, C.-Y., & Ackerman, M. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14121 · Cited by 28
Liu, F., Lu, Y., & Wang, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537833 · Cited by 27
Behavior‒Output Control Theory, Trust and Social Loafing in Virtual Teams
Robert, L. (2020) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti4030039 · Cited by 32
Self-citationExploring the State of Discipline on the Formation of Swift Trust within Global Virtual Teams
Yusof, S. A. M., & Zakaria, N. (2012) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.272 · Cited by 24
Decision-Making: Preventing Miscommunication and Creating Shared Meaning Between Stakeholders
Doyle, E. E. H., & Paton, D. (2017) · Advances in volcanology · doi:10.1007/11157_2016_31 · Cited by 28
Mak, S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108649636.018 · Cited by 27
Expectations and Trust in Automated Vehicles
Zhang, Q., Yang, X. J., & Robert, L. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382986 · Cited by 27
Self-citationTrust and Group Efficiency in Multinational Virtual Team Collaboration: A Longitudinal Study
Cheng, X., Bao, Y., Yu, X., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-020-09722-x · Cited by 33
Tzeng, S.-Y., & Ho, T.-Y. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211068855 · Cited by 25
Creative Problem Solving in GSS Groups: Do Creative Styles Matter?
Ray, D., & Romano, N. (2012) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9309-3 · Cited by 25
Breugst, N., Preller, R., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2298 · Cited by 28
Trust: Condition of action or condition of appraisal
Barbalet, J. M. (2018) · International Sociology · doi:10.1177/0268580918812268 · Cited by 26
Capiola, A., Baxter, H. C., Pfahler, M. D., Calhoun, C. S., & Bobko, P. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343420943460 · Cited by 27
Torro, O., Jalo, H., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3440868 · Cited by 24
An Empirical Investigation of Swift Trust in Humanitarian Logistics Operations
Lu, Q., Goh, M., & de Souza, R. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59099-2_9 · Cited by 24
You, Me, and the AI: The Role of Third‐Party Human Teammates for Trust Formation Toward AI Teammates
Erengin, T., Briker, R., & de Jong, S. B. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2857 · Cited by 33
How to create trust quickly: a comparative empirical investigation of the bases of swift trust
Kroeger, F., Racko, G., & Burchell, B. J. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/beaa041 · Cited by 25
Schulze, J., Krumm, S., Eid, M., Müller, H., & Göritz, A. S. (2023) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12461 · Cited by 30
Cleary, Y., Slattery, D. M., Flammia, M., & Minacori, P. (2018) · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication · doi:10.1177/0047281618775908 · Cited by 23
Ye, T., You, S., & Robert, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14876 · Cited by 25
Self-citationHuman-Centered Trustworthy Framework: A Human–Computer Interaction Perspective
Sousa, S., Lamas, D., Cravino, J., & Martins, P. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2023.3287563 · Cited by 33
Are Sponsored Links Effective? Investigating the Impact of Trust in Search Engine Advertising
Lu, Y., Chau, M., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3023365 · Cited by 20
Evaluating website quality: which decision criteria do consumers use to evaluate website quality?
Longstreet, P., Brooks, S. L., Featherman, M. S., & Loiacono, E. T. (2021) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-05-2020-0328 · Cited by 22
Joo, Y., Kim, S.-N., Kim, B.-C., Cho, G.-H., & Kim, J. (2023) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107092 · Cited by 22
Mindful communication: A novel approach to improving delegation and increasing patient safety
Anthony, M. K., & Vidal, K. (2010) · The online journal of issues in nursing · doi:10.3912/ojin.vol15no02mano2 · Cited by 22
Perceived Risk and Trust in Online Group Buying Context
Sun, P., Liu, Y.-L., & Luo, J.-J. (2010) · International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII) · doi:10.1109/iciii.2010.478 · Cited by 21
Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, trust and individual satisfaction in virtual teams
Robert, L., & You, S. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.9776/13255 · Cited by 21
Self-citationLee, C. S., Watson‐Manheim, M. B., & Chudoba, K. M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.008 · Cited by 22
Stability & reconstruction operations as mega projects: Drivers of temporary network effectiveness
van Fenema, P. C., Rietjens, S., & van Baalen, P. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.006 · Cited by 24
Organizational trust in a networked world
Giustiniano, L., & Bolici, F. (2012) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/14779961211261076 · Cited by 21
Applying the swift trust model to human-robot teaming
Haring, K. S., Phillips, E. K., Lazzara, E. H., Ullman, D. L., Baker, A. L., & Keebler, J. R. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00017-4 · Cited by 20
Tong, S. C., & Chan, F. F. Y. (2022) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-08-2021-0094 · Cited by 31
How Should an AI Trust its Human Teammates? Exploring Possible Cues of Artificial Trust
Jorge, C. C., Jonker, C. M., & Tielman, M. L. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3635475 · Cited by 22
I rate you. you rate me. should we do so publicly
Teng, C.-Y., Lauterbach, D., & Adamic, L. A. (2010) · Cited by 20
How can cross-cultural virtual learning teams collaborate effectively: A longitudinal study
Yu, X., Shen, Y., Cheng, X., & Bao, Y. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103667 · Cited by 24
Zeuge, A., Schaefer, C., Weigel, A., Eckhardt, A., & Niehaves, B. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102636 · Cited by 20
Hardin, A. M., Davison, R. M., Schneider, C., Looney, C. A., & Sarker, S. (2023) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12484 · Cited by 18
Do You Trust What You See? Toward A Multidimensional Measure of Trust in Visualization
Pandey, S., McKinley, O. G., Crouser, R. J., & Ottley, A. (2023) · Visualization · doi:10.1109/vis54172.2023.00014 · Cited by 19
Cooperation in the Gig Economy: Insights from Upwork Freelancers
Fulker, Z., & Riedl, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637314 · Cited by 24
Show me your expertise before teaming up
Ren, R., Yan, B., & Jian, L. (2020) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2019-0024 · Cited by 20
Liu, H., Chen, N.-H., Wang, I., Wu, S.-M., Han, C.-Y. S., Hsu, D., Han, H., & Huang, D. (2021) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.010 · Cited by 21
Trust and experience in online auctions
Ow, T. T., Spaid, B. I., Wood, C. A., & Ba, S. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2018.1517478 · Cited by 20
Design principles for social exchange in social virtual reality-enabled virtual teams
Torro, O., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2023) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00832-w · Cited by 21
EFFECTS OF AUGMENTED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS ON DRIVER TRUST IN SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATION
Petersen, L., Tilbury, D., Robert, L., & Yang, X. J. (2017) · SAE Technical Paper Series · doi:10.4271/2024-01-3654 · Cited by 18
Self-citationZheng, S., Yan, M., Liang, Y., Chen, Y., Wei, Q., & Li, S. (2024) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101013 · Cited by 22
Dyadic characteristics ofguanxiand their consequences
Barbalet, J. M. (2017) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12133 · Cited by 20
A classification of Challenges encountered in Complex Teamwork Settings
Kazemitabar, M., Lajoie, S. P., & Li, T. (2022) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-022-09370-0 · Cited by 18
Li, J., He, Y., Yin, S., & Liu, L. (2023) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3580585.3607171 · Cited by 17
Barriers to Deceiving Other Group Members in Virtual Settings
Marett, K., & George, J. F. (2012) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9297-3 · Cited by 18
Mapping knowledge management authoring patterns and practices
Curado, C., Oliveira, M. F. D. A., Antocirc, Maccedil, N. C. G., & Ada, A. (2011) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · doi:10.5897/ajbm.9000395 · Cited by 16
Guo, W., Feng, J. B., McKenna, B., & Zhang, P. (2017) · Asian Business & Management · doi:10.1057/s41291-017-0019-1 · Cited by 16
Comparing the Effects of False Alarms and Misses on Humans' Trust in (Semi)Autonomous Vehicles
Azevedo-Sa, H., Jayaraman, S. K., Esterwood, C. T., Yang, X. J., Robert, L., & Tilbury, D. M. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3371382.3378371 · Cited by 16
Self-citationMcNab, A. L., Basoglu, K. A., Sarker, S., & Yu, Y. (2012) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-011-0081-z · Cited by 17
Zakaria, N., & Yusof, S. A. M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_11 · Cited by 17
Robert, L. P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858534 · Cited by 15
Self-citationActions speak louder than words
Koçoğlu, İ., Lynn, G. S., Jung, Y., Dominick, P. G., Aronson, Z. H., & Burke, P. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2018-1018 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Robert, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y.-T. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-279
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2040936209
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 174
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 23.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- swift trust, knowledge-based trust, virtual teams, face-to-face teams, trust formation, information and communication technologies, trustworthiness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review