Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed

Open access
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)·2011·EFSA Journal

Abstract

Abstract T‐2 toxin and HT‐2 toxin are mycotoxins produced by various Fusarium species. The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risk to human and animal health related to the presence of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin in food and feed. A total of 20,519 results for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins in food, feed and unprocessed grains, collected in 2005–2010 from 22 European countries, were used in the evaluation. The highest mean concentrations for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins were observed in grains and grain milling products, notably in oats and oat products. Grains and grain‐based foods, in particular bread, fine bakery wares, grain milling products, and breakfast cereals, made the largest contribution to the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin exposure for humans. T‐2 toxin is rapidly metabolised to a large number of products, HT‐2 toxin being a major metabolite. Pigs are amongst the most sensitive animals towards the effects of T‐2 toxin, the most sensitive endpoints being immunological or haematological effects. Using these data and a benchmark dose analysis the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain established a group tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 100 ng/kg b.w. for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins. Estimates of chronic human dietary exposure to the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins based on the available occurrence data are below the TDI for populations of all age groups, and thus not a health concern. For ruminants, rabbits and farmed fish the estimated exposures to the sum of these toxins based on the available occurrence data are considered unlikely to be a health concern, while for pigs, poultry, dogs and horses the risk of adverse health effects is low. For cats the health risk from the exposure to T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins cannot be assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2481

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C.
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
2481
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211264888
Cited by
355
References
84
FWCI
24.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2481
The paper
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C. (2011). Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.