The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed
Open accessAbstract
Abstract T‐2 toxin and HT‐2 toxin are mycotoxins produced by various Fusarium species. The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risk to human and animal health related to the presence of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin in food and feed. A total of 20,519 results for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins in food, feed and unprocessed grains, collected in 2005–2010 from 22 European countries, were used in the evaluation. The highest mean concentrations for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins were observed in grains and grain milling products, notably in oats and oat products. Grains and grain‐based foods, in particular bread, fine bakery wares, grain milling products, and breakfast cereals, made the largest contribution to the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxin exposure for humans. T‐2 toxin is rapidly metabolised to a large number of products, HT‐2 toxin being a major metabolite. Pigs are amongst the most sensitive animals towards the effects of T‐2 toxin, the most sensitive endpoints being immunological or haematological effects. Using these data and a benchmark dose analysis the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain established a group tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 100 ng/kg b.w. for the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins. Estimates of chronic human dietary exposure to the sum of T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins based on the available occurrence data are below the TDI for populations of all age groups, and thus not a health concern. For ruminants, rabbits and farmed fish the estimated exposures to the sum of these toxins based on the available occurrence data are considered unlikely to be a health concern, while for pigs, poultry, dogs and horses the risk of adverse health effects is low. For cats the health risk from the exposure to T‐2 and HT‐2 toxins cannot be assessed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats
(2006) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/10668 · Cited by 1,216
Use of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database in Exposure Assessment
Authority, E. F. S. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2097 · Cited by 1,189
IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans
(1996) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(97)89591-8 · Cited by 1,083
Leeson, S., & SUMMERS, J. D. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,018
Mycotoxins in Human and Animal Health
Rodricks, J. V., Hesseltine, C. W., & Mehlman, M. A. (1977) · Cited by 1,018
Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients
Binder, E. M., Tan, L. M., Chin, L. J., Handl, J., & Richard, J. (2007) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.005 · Cited by 722
Sulyok, M., Berthiller, F., Krska, R., & Schuhmacher, R. (2006) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.2640 · Cited by 681
Effects of trichothecene mycotoxins on eukaryotic cells: A review
Rocha, O., Ansari, K., & Doohan, F. M. (2005) · Food Additives and Contaminants · doi:10.1080/02652030500058403 · Cited by 591
IMMUNOMODULATION BY FUNGAL TOXINS
Genevieve S. Bondy, J. J. P. (2000) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/109374000281113 · Cited by 575
Schothorst, R. C., & van Egmond, H. P. (2004) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.04.045 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination
Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I. P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., et al. (2016) · Mycotoxin Research · doi:10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7 · Cited by 689
Ferrigo, D., Raiola, A., & Causin, R. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21050627 · Cited by 355
Dietary mycotoxins, co-exposure, and carcinogenesis in humans: Short review
De Ruyck, K., De Boevre, M., Huybrechts, I., & De Saeger, S. (2015) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.07.003 · Cited by 268
T-2 and HT-2 Toxins: Toxicity, Occurrence and Analysis: A Review
Meneely, J., Greer, B., Kolawole, O., & Elliott, C. (2023) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins15080481 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- (CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C.
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2481
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211264888
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 24.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2481
- The paper
- (CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C. (2011). Scientific Opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed: T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.