The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific Opinion on the risks for public and animal health related to the presence of citrinin in food and feed
Open accessAbstract
and occurs mainly in stored grains. The available occurrence data were not adequate to carry out a dietary exposure assessment. Citrinin is nephrotoxic and a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 20 µg/kg body weight (b.w.) per day was identified from a 90-day study in rats. Due to the limitations and uncertainties in the database, the derivation of a health-based guidance value was not considered appropriate but a level of no concern for nephrotoxicity of 0.2 µg/kg b.w. per day was determined. Based on the available data a concern for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity could not be excluded at the level of no concern for nephrotoxicity. In the absence of adequate exposure data, characterisation of the risk of citrinin as a food contaminant was based on the estimate of the citrinin concentrations in grains and grain-based products that would result in an exposure equal to the level of no concern for nephrotoxicity. For high consuming toddlers, other children and adults this citrinin concentration is between 9 and 53 µg citrinin/kg and between 19 and 100 µg citrinin/kg for average consumers, respectively. For animals, risk characterisation was based on the estimate of the citrinin concentration in grains that would result in exceedance of the NOAEL of 20 µg/kg b.w. per day for pigs, which ranged between 640 and 1 173 µg/kg. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the impact of uncertainties on the risk assessment is large, and more data regarding the toxicity and the occurrence of citrinin in food and feed in Europe are needed to enable refinement of the risk assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marked Variability of Monacolin Levels in Commercial Red Yeast Rice Products: Buyer Beware!
Gordon, R. Y., Cooperman, T., Obermeyer, W., & Becker, D. J. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.382 · Cited by 184 · cited 1×
“…using an enzyme immunoassay (LOD = 15 mg/kg), found citrinin in 7 out of 9 Chinese RMR dietary supplements at measurable concentrations, while Gordon et al. (2010) used LC-MS/MS (LOD not reported) and found in 4 out of 12 commercial RMR formulations citrinin in the concentration range 24 to…”
MethodToxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in mature corn silage
Richard, E., Heutte, N., Sage, L., Pottier, D., Bouchart, V., Lebailly, P., & Garon, D. (2007) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.06.018 · Cited by 145 · cited 1×
“In addition to citrinin, deoxynivalenol, aflatoxin B1, gliotoxin and zearalenone were also detected (Garon et al., 2006; Richard et al., 2007; 2009).”
Background
Cited by
Filamentous fungi and mycotoxins in cheese: A review
Hymery, N., Vasseur, V., Coton, M., Mounier, J., Jany, J., Barbier, G., & Coton, E. (2014) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12069 · Cited by 215
Food-Borne Mycotoxicoses: Pathologies and Public Health Impact
Patial, V., Asrani, R. K., & Thakur, M. (2018) · Foodborne Diseases · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811444-5.00009-9 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- (CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C.
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2605-2605
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802207531
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.