Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 60Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployee Performance and ManagementPolish Legal and Social Issues

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 19 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The advantages and disadvantages of remote working from the perspective of young employees.

Kłopotek·2017·Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.29119/1899-6116.2017.40.3

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Kłopotek
Venue
Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
Published
2017-01-01
OpenAlex
W3030726907
Cited by
54
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
closed
Locations
Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Polish Legal and Social Issues
Keywords
remote work, young workers, advantages and disadvantages, staff perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The advantages and disadvantages of remote working from the perspective of young employees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.29119/1899-6116.2017.40.3
The paper
Kłopotek. (2017). The advantages and disadvantages of remote working from the perspective of young employees. Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy. https://doi.org/10.29119/1899-6116.2017.40.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.