Cited by 4Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder

Open access
Khamoshi Ghalenoei, Sanam, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad Uniuersity, Mansouri, Ahmad, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad Uniuersity·2020·Research on Addiction

Abstract

Objective: Substance use disorder is one of the chronic and debilitating disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on self-compassion and self-criticism in individuals with opioid use disorder. Method: The present study was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest design with a control group. Thirty people with opioid use disorder referred to Granmehr and Game-no addiction treatment centers in Mashhad were selected by convenience sampling method and were randomly placed into two experimental (n=15) and control (n=15) groups. The participants in the experimental group received acceptance and commitment therapy for 8 sessions, but the participants in the control group did not receive any treatment. Participants responded to the self-compassion scale and the self-criticism scale. The data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the variables of self-compassion and self-criticism. In other words, acceptance and commitment therapy was effective in increasing self-compassion and reducing self-criticism in individuals with opioid use disorder. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that therapists and other mental health professionals can use acceptance and commitment therapy to improve self-compassion and self-criticism in individuals with opioid use disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29252/etiadpajohi.14.57.237

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khamoshi Ghalenoei, S., Neyshabur Branch, I. A. U., Mansouri, A., & Neyshabur Branch, I. A. U.
Affiliations
Islamic Azad University of Nishapur (IR)
Venue
Research on Addiction
Publisher
CMV Verlag
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
14
Issue
57
Pages
237-254
ISSN
  • 0304-6168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2008-4307
OpenAlex
W3120953835
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
fa
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی اعتیادپژوهی (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, self-compassion, self-criticism, opioid use disorder, addiction treatment, psychotherapy effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review