Investigation of Psychometric Properties of Misophonia Questionnaire
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Mehrabizadeh Honarmand and Roushani (23), the cut-off point of the tool was calculated to be 35.9.
“According to the study of Mehrabizadeh Honarmand and Roushani (23), the cut-off point of the tool was calculated to be 35.9.”
From Effectiveness of Online Group-mindfulness and Acceptance-based Therapy and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy on Misophonia (2022) · cites this paper as Mehrabizadeh Honarmand and Roushani (23)
The Abstract (page not provided) reports reliability, factor structure, and convergent validity for the Misophonia Questionnaire, but gives no cut-off score. Searches for “35.9” and cut-off terminology found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed value. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 · Cited by 5,989 · see citing works
Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13 · Cited by 5,965 · see citing works
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: II. Validity
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008 · Cited by 2,799 · see citing works
The Brown assessment of beliefs scale: Reliability and validity
Eisen, J. L., Phillips, K. A., Baer, L., Beer, D. A., Atala, K. D., & Rasmussen, S. A. (1998) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.155.1.102 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Misophonia: Diagnostic Criteria for a New Psychiatric Disorder
Schröder, A., Vulink, N., & Denys, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054706 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Misophonia: Incidence, Phenomenology, and Clinical Correlates in an Undergraduate Student Sample
Wu, M. S., Lewin, A. B., Murphy, T. K., & Storch, E. A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22098 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
A Large-Scale Study of Misophonia
Rouw, R., & Erfanian, M. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22500 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Treatments for decreased sound tolerance (hyperacusis and misophonia)
Jastreboff, M., & Jastreboff, P. (2014) · Seminars in Hearing · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1372527 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Wu, M. S., & Storch, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.05.001 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Deacon, B. J., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.04.009 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Misophonia: A new mental disorder?
Taylor, S. (2017) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2017.05.003 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
‘Mastication rage’: a review of misophonia – an under-recognised symptom of psychiatric relevance?
Bruxner, G. (2015) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856215613010 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghorbani, S., Ashouri, A., Gharraee, B., & Farahani, H. (2022) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5812/ijpbs-120159 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“According to the study of Mehrabizadeh Honarmand and Roushani (23), the cut-off point of the tool was calculated to be 35.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPreliminary validation of the Norwegian version of misophonia questionnaire (MQ-NOR)
Larsen, E.-A., Hovland, T., Nielsen, G. E., & Larsen, L. (2022) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2022.2111372 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Uglik‐Marucha, N., Siepsiak, M., Zielińska, J., Dragan, W. Ł., Gregory, J. E., & Vitoratou, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372870 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Psychometric Properties of Misophonia Measurement Questionnaires: A Systematic Review
Maleki, M., Pashazadeh, F., & Abolhasanpour, N. (2025) · Journal of Audiology & Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2025.00241 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Parviniannasab, A. M., Yarbakhsh, H., Rahimpoor, R., Ebrahimifar, Z., Delam, H., & Bazrafshan, M.-R. (2026) · Mental Illness · doi:10.1155/mij/7573472
- Authors
- Mehrabizadeh Honarmand, M., Department of Psychology, F. O. E. A. P., Roushani, K., & Department of Psychology, F. O. E. A. P.
- Affiliations
- Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR)
- ORCID
- Roushani, Khadijeh
- Venue
- The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam
- Publisher
- CMV Verlag
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 13-22
- ISSN
- 2322-1887 (ISSN-L)
- 2345-4814
- OpenAlex
- W2941391342
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fa
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- misophonia, psychometric properties, questionnaire validation, sound sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
