Cited by 5COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

COVID-19, flattening the curve: recommendations towards control and managing a second wave

Open access
Fenemigho, Iziegbe, Ukponmwan, Ewaenosa, Nnakwue, Elizabeth C, Udoete, Iboro, Asuzu, Chisom, Adaralegbe, Adeleye, Effiong, Utibe·2020·Journal of Global Health Reports

Abstract

Flattening the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) curve has been one of the most important public health targets since the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide. In this review, we examined measures that were key to flattening the curve in countries that have succeeded in achieving this against other countries. The most consistent factors seen from studies were aggressive testing, contact tracing, social distancing, quarantine measures, and innovative technology. These factors were reported to have helped achieve drop in the number of daily new cases reported. Countries like South Korea and Australia employed extensive testing of their residents as a means of curbing the pandemic and limiting its spread. China and Spain employed tracking software and artificial intelligence (AI) in ensuring that infected individuals remained isolated for the recommended number of days and that close contacts of positive cases were tested and quarantined as well. While efforts towards developing a vaccine are still ongoing, and the possibility of a second wave in many countries, we discussed pertinent public health measures and recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29392/001c.14151

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenemigho, I., Ukponmwan, E., Nnakwue, E. C., Udoete, I., Asuzu, C., Adaralegbe, A., & Effiong, U.
Affiliations
  • University of South Wales (GB)
  • University of Benin (NG)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • All Saints University School of Medicine (DM)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Central Michigan University (US)
Venue
Journal of Global Health Reports
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
4
ISSN
2399-1623 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048428145
Cited by
5
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Global Health Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, flattening the curve, second wave, public health measures, large-scale testing, contact tracing, social distancing, quarantine, artificial intelligence, pandemic response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review