CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PRODUCTION OF VOWELS AND NUCLEAR ACCENTS BY CHILEAN LEARNERS OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE

Del Saz, María, Grau, Ximena·2022·RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada
DOI 10.29393/rla60-8pvmx20008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29393/rla60-8pvmx20008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2016). A review study of error analysis theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 2, 49-59.
  2. Baigorri, M., Campanelli, L., & Levy, E. S. (2018). Perception of American- English Vowels by Early and Late Spanish-English Bilinguals. Language and Speech, 62(4), 681-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918806933 · DOI
  3. Baitman, B. & Véliz Campos, M. (2012). A comparison of oral evaluation rat- ings by native English speaker teachers and nonnative English speaker teach- ers. Lingüística y Literatura, 27, 171-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716- 58112013000100010. · DOI
  4. Barreiro, S. C. (2002). Speech perception in L2. Odisea, 2, 7-14. http://dx.doi. org/10.25115/odisea.v0i2.10. Barrios, S., Jiang, N., & Idsardi, W. J. (2016). Similarity in L2 Phonology: Evi- dence from L1 Spanish late-learners' perception and lexical representation of English vowel contrasts. Second Language Research, 32(3), 367-395. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267658316630784. · DOI
  5. Benrabah, M. (1997). Word stress -A source of unintelligibility in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 157-165. https://doi. org/10.1515/iral.1997.35.3.157. · DOI
  6. Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech percep- tion. Commonalities and complementarities. In O-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 60 (1), I Sem. 2022 (Eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, (pp. 31-52). Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publish- ing Company.
  7. Bohn, O.-S. & Flege, J. E. (1990) Interlingual identification and the role of for- eign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008912. · DOI
  8. Bradlow, A. R. (1995). A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(3), 1916-1924. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412064. · DOI
  9. Byers, E. & Yavas, M. (2017). Vowel reduction in word-final position by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. PLoS One 12(4): e0175226. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175226 · DOI
  10. Cebrian, J. (2019). Perceptual assimilation of British English vowels to Span- ish monophthongs and diphthongs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(1), EL52-EL58. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5087645 · DOI
  11. Derwing, T.M., & Munro, M.J. (2008). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching 42, 476 -490. DOI:10.1017/ S026144480800551X · DOI
  12. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P.Warren (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3363-3367). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Tech- nology Association Inc
  13. Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87-100. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Edwards, J. G. H., & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.). (2008). Phonology and second lan- guage acquisition (Vol. 36). John Benjamins Publishing.
  15. Erickson, D. (2013). Speech rhythm in English and applications to second language teaching. Acoustical Science and Technology, 34(3), 153-158. doi:10.1250/ast.34.153. · DOI
  16. Escudero, P. (2000). Developmental patterns in the adult L2 acquisition of new contrasts: the acoustic cue weighting in the perception of Scottish tense/lax vowels by Spanish speakers. Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, University of Edin- burgh.
  17. Escudero, P., & Chládková, K. (2010). Spanish listeners' perception of American and Southern British English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(5), EL254-EL260. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3488794 · DOI
  18. Escudero, P. & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Jour- nal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406-EL412. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.3701708 · DOI
  19. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (1989). The perception of English vowels by native speakers of Spanish. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(S1), S85-S85. doi: 10.1121/1.2027177 · DOI
  20. Fox, R. A., Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimension- al scaling analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(4), 2540-2551. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411974. · DOI
  21. Gluhareva, D. & Prieto, P. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Re- search, 21(5), 609-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816651463. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Goldstein, B. A. & Bunta, F. (2012). Positive and negative transfer in the pho- nological systems of bilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911425817 · DOI
  23. Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201-223. DOI: 10.2307/3588378 · DOI
  24. Incera, S., Shah, A. P., McLennan, C. T., & Wetzel, M. T. (2017). Sentence con- text influences the subjective perception of foreign accents. Acta psychologica, 172, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.011 · DOI
  25. Iverson, P. & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first- language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 126(2), 866-877. DOI: 10.1121/1.3148196 · DOI
  26. Jiang, N. (2018). Second language processing: An introduction. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
  27. Klassen, J. (2013). Second language acquisition of English focus prosody: Evi- dence from Spanish native speakers. In J. Cabrelli Amaro et al. (eds.), Pro- ceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 76-84). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  28. Ladd, D.R. (1979). Light and Shadow: A study of the syntax and semantics of sentence is English. In L. R. Waugh & F. Van Coetsen (eds.), Contributions to Grammatical studies-Semantics and Syntax. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  29. Leal, T., Destruel, E., & Hoot, B. (2019). The acquisition of focus in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 35(4), 449-477. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0267658318784343. · DOI
  30. Luchini, P. L. (2017). Measurements for accentedness, pause and nuclear stress placement in the EFL context. Ilha do Desterro, 70(3), 185-200. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p185. · DOI
  31. Major, R. C. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (eds.) Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 64-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil. · DOI
  32. 05maj O'Brien, M. & Gut, U. (2010). Phonological and phonetic realisation of dif- ferent types of focus in L2 speech. In K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, M. Wrembel, and M. Kul (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds (pp. 205-215). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  33. Ortiz, H. (1995). Nucleus placement in English and Spanish: A pilot study of pat- terns of interference. In Lewis J. Windsor (ed.), Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honor of Professor J. D. O'Connor (pp. 255-265). Lon- don & New York: Routledge.
  34. Ramírez Verdugo, D. (2002). Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: a study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal, 26, 115-132.
  35. Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Saito, K. (2011). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in na- tive-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: an instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20(1), 45-59. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2010.540326 · DOI
  37. Saito, K. (2018). Advanced Second Language Segmental and Suprasegmental Ac- quisition. In Paul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benatti (eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 282-303). Hoboken; NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650. · DOI
  38. Shea, C. (2019). Dominance, Proficiency, and Spanish Heritage Speakers' pro- duction of English and Spanish Vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000328 · DOI
  39. Smith, B. L., Johnson, E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2019). ESL learners' intra-speaker variability in producing American English tense and lax vowels. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/ jslp.15050.smi. · DOI
  40. Strange, W. & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learn- ers: The re-education of selective perception. Phonology and second language acquisition, 36, 153-192. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.09str. · DOI
  41. Strange, W., Bohn, O. S., Trent, S. A., & Nishi, K. (2004). Acoustic and per- ceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1791-1807. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.1687832 · DOI
  42. Sugiura, K. & Hori, T. (2019). Effect of repeating rhythmic beats on short sen- tences on L2 pronunciation of Japanese learners of English. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P.Warren (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 1347-1351). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
  43. Swan, M. & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A teacher's guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Trimbler, J. C. (2013). Perceiving intonational cues in a foreign language: Percep- tion of sentence type in two dialects of Spanish. In C. Howe et al. (eds.), Se- lected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 78-92).
  45. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  46. Valenzuela Farías, M. G. (2013). A comparative analysis of intonation between Spanish and English speakers in tag questions, wh-questions, inverted ques- tions, and repetition questions. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(4), 1061-1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982013005000021. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Del Saz, M., & Grau, X.
Venue
RLA. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada
Publisher
Universidad de Concepcion
Published
2022-06
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
219-246
ISSN
0718-4883
DOI
10.29393/rla60-8pvmx20008
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review