Cited by 20Diabetes Treatment and ManagementGastrointestinal motility and disordersBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Glucagonlike Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly—Benefits for Glucose Control and Weight Loss with Side Effects of Delaying Gastric Emptying

Open access
Parkman, Henry P., Rim, Daniel S., Anolik, Jonathan R., Dadparvar, Simin, Maurer, Alan H.·2024·Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Abstract

Glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are being increasingly used for glycemic control in patients with diabetes and for weight loss and weight management in obese subjects. There has been recent public awareness of the potential of GLP-1 RAs to delay gastric emptying and cause gastroparesis. By delaying gastric emptying, these agents can complicate the clinical evaluation of patients on these drugs by affecting diagnostic testing for gastroparesis. This article discusses GLP-1 RAs and their effects on gastric emptying, gastric food retention, and gastroparesis. This article highlights how physicians should be attuned to the gastric side effects of these popular therapeutic agents for blood glucose control in people with diabetes and for weight loss and weight management in obese patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnmt.123.266800

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gastric emptying-delaying effect of GLP-1 RAs may be underestimated because paracetamol absorption testing cannot quantify the actual volume or consistency of gastric contents.

    “Therefore, the gastric emptying–delaying effect of GLP-1 RAs may be underestimated, warranting a more conservative approach in clinical practice.”

    From Delayed gastric emptying induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and its implications for perioperative risk during anesthesia (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The sections on gastric emptying and patient management state that GLP-1 RAs delay gastric emptying and recommend precautions in testing and clinical procedures. They do not say that the effect may be underestimated because paracetamol absorption testing cannot measure the volume or consistency of gastric contents; searches for paracetamol and underestimation found no such passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Paracetamol absorption testing, used to assess gastric emptying in the semaglutide studies, is limited by its inability to quantify the actual volume or consistency of gastric contents.

    “However, both studies indirectly assessed gastric emptying through paracetamol absorption testing, a method limited by its inability to quantify the actual volume or consistency of gastric contents [36].”

    From Delayed gastric emptying induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and its implications for perioperative risk during anesthesia (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The ‘GLP-1 Agonists and Gastric Emptying Testing’ section (page unavailable) calls gastric emptying scintigraphy the gold standard for quantifying gastric emptying. Our copy does not discuss paracetamol absorption testing in semaglutide studies or say whether that test can quantify the volume or consistency of gastric contents (searched: paracetamol, acetaminophen, and those measurement terms). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parkman, H. P., Rim, D. S., Anolik, J. R., Dadparvar, S., & Maurer, A. H.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Published
2024-01-09
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
  • 0091-4916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-5675
OpenAlex
W4390699803
Cited by
20
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, gastric emptying, gastroparesis, diabetes mellitus, obesity, weight loss, glycemic control, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Obesity, Peptides, Weight Loss, Gastroparesis, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review