Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response

Open access
Ben-Haim, Simona, Ell, Peter·2009·Journal of Nuclear Medicine
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.108.054205
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Multimodality imaging, as represented by its greatest exponent, PET/CT, has a firm place in the evaluation of a patient presenting with cancer. With 18F-FDG, PET/CT is rapidly becoming the key investigative tool for the staging and assessment of cancer recurrence. In the last 5 y, PET/CT has also gained widespread acceptance as a key tool used to demonstrate early response to intervention and therapy. In this setting, a major clinical need is being addressed with 18F-FDG PET/CT, because of its inherent ability to demonstrate (before other markers of response) if disease modification has occurred. This review presents available evidence to this effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.108.054205

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60956-3 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60956-3
  2. 2007, Harv Bus Rev., 85, 108
  3. 2007, Eur J Cancer., 43, 1642
  4. 2004, J Nucl Med., 45, 357
  5. 2006, J Nucl Med., 47, 1059
  6. 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70274-7 · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70274-7
  7. 1997, CA Cancer J Clin., 47, 323, 10.3322/canjclin.47.6.323 · doi:10.3322/canjclin.47.6.323
  8. 10.1002/ajh.21158 · doi:10.1002/ajh.21158
  9. 10.3324/haematol.12013 · doi:10.3324/haematol.12013
  10. 10.2967/jnumed.107.046292 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.046292
  11. 10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7 · doi:10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7
  12. 10.1002/cncr.22292 · doi:10.1002/cncr.22292
  13. 2003, J Nucl Med., 44, 224
  14. 2002, J Nucl Med., 43, 325
  15. 2005, J Nucl Med., 46, 1144
  16. 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7406 · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.05.7406
  17. 10.1097/01243894-200602000-00009 · doi:10.1097/01243894-200602000-00009
  18. 10.1016/j.crad.2008.01.012 · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.01.012
  19. 2008, Nucl Med Commun., 29, 4, 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f1b9c7 · doi:10.1097/mnm.0b013e3282f1b9c7
  20. 2004, Appl Radiol., 33, 9
  21. 2005, J Nucl Med., 46, 758
  22. 2001, J Nucl Med., 42, 586
  23. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00049-1 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00049-1
  24. 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.07.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2005.07.010
  25. 1991, J Nucl Med., 32, 1485
  26. 2005, Eur Radiol., 165, 1658
  27. 2004, J Am Coll Surg., 199, 1
  28. 2006, J Nucl Med., 47, 1241
  29. 10.1007/s00259-007-0627-7 · doi:10.1007/s00259-007-0627-7
  30. 10.1002/hed.20080 · doi:10.1002/hed.20080
  31. 2005, Lung Cancer., 49, S33
  32. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.037 · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.037
  33. 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.035 · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.09.035

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Ben-Haim, S., & Ell, P.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2009-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
88-99
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
DOI
10.2967/jnumed.108.054205
OpenAlex
W2095520368
Cited by
351
References
59
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.108.054205
The paper
Ben-Haim, S., & Ell, P. (2009). 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.054205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.