Cited by 213Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiation Dosimetry for 177 Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions

Open access

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted radioligand therapy is increasingly used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to estimate the absorbed doses for normal organs and tumor lesions using 177Lu-PSMA I&T (I&T is imaging and therapy) in patients undergoing up to 4 cycles of radioligand therapy. Results were compared with pretherapeutic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBEDCC)] (68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC) PET. Methods: A total of 34 cycles in 18 patients were analyzed retrospectively. In 15 patients the first, in 9 the second, in 5 the third, and in 5 the fourth cycle was analyzed, respectively. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed at least between 30–120 min, 24 h, and 6–8 d after administration. Regions of interest covering the whole body, organs, and up to 4 tumor lesions were drawn. Organ and tumor masses were derived from pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Absorbed doses for individual cycles were calculated using OLINDA/EXM. SUVs from pretherapeutic PET were compared with absorbed doses and with change of SUV. Results: The mean whole-body effective dose for all cycles was 0.06 ± 0.03 Sv/GBq. The mean absorbed organ doses were 0.72 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq for the kidneys; 0.12 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq for the liver; and 0.55 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq for the parotid, 0.64 ± 0.40 Gy/GBq for the submandibular, and 3.8 ± 1.4 Gy/GBq for the lacrimal glands. Absorbed organ doses were relatively constant among the 4 different cycles. Tumor lesions received a mean absorbed dose per cycle of 3.2 ± 2.6 Gy/GBq (range, 0.22–12 Gy/GBq). Doses to tumor lesions gradually decreased, with 3.5 ± 2.9 Gy/GBq for the first, 3.3 ± 2.5 Gy/GBq for the second, 2.7 ± 2.3 Gy/GBq for the third, and 2.4 ± 2.2 Gy/GBq for the fourth cycle. SUVs of pretherapeutic PET moderately correlated with absorbed dose (r = 0.44, P < 0.001 for SUVmax; r = 0.43, P < 0.001 for SUVmean) and moderately correlated with the change of SUV (r = 0.478, P < 0.001 for SUVmax, and r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for SUVmean). Conclusion: Organ- and tumor-absorbed doses for 177Lu-PSMA I&T are comparable to recent reports and complement these with information on an excellent correlation between the 4 therapy cycles. With the kidneys representing the critical organ, a cumulative activity of 40 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA I&T appears to be safe and justifiable. The correlation between pretherapeutic SUV and absorbed tumor dose emphasizes the need for PSMA-ligand PET imaging for patient selection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.116.178483

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–213 of 213

Metadata

Authors
Okamoto, S., Thieme, A., Allmann, J., D’Alessandria, C., Maurer, T., Retz, M., Tauber, R., Heck, M. M., Wester, H.-J., Tamaki, N., Fendler, W. P., Herrmann, K., Pfob, C. H., Scheidhauer, K., Schwaiger, M., Ziegler, S., & Eiber, M.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2016-09-22
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
445-450
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
OpenAlex
W2523192478
Cited by
213
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
177Lu-PSMA-I&T, radioligand therapy, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, absorbed dose, tumor dose, OLINDA/EXM, dosimetry, parotid gland, lacrimal gland, kidney dose, liver dose
MeSH terms
Aged, Dipeptides, Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring, Humans, Lutetium, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organ Specificity, Radiotherapy Dosage, Retrospective Studies, Tissue Distribution, Whole-Body Counting, Treatment Outcome, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography, Organ Sparing Treatments, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, Absorption, Radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review