Diagnostic Value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT Versus MRI in the Setting of Antibody-Specific Autoimmune Encephalitis
Open accessAbstract
Diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis presents some challenges in the clinical setting because of varied clinical presentations and delay in obtaining antibody panel results. We examined the role of neuroimaging in the setting of autoimmune encephalitides, comparing the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT versus conventional brain imaging with MRI. Methods: A retrospective study was performed assessing the positivity rate of MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT during the initial workup of 23 patients proven to have antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis. 18F-FDG PET/CT studies were analyzed both qualitatively and semiquantitatively. Areas of cortical lobar hypo (hyper)-metabolism in the cerebrum that were 2 SDx from the mean were recorded as abnormal. Results: On visual inspection, all patients were identified as having an abnormal pattern of 18F-FDG uptake. In semiquantitative analysis, at least 1 region of interest with metabolic change was identified in 22 of 23 (95.6%) patients using a discriminating z score of 2. Overall, 18F-FDG PET/CT was more often abnormal during the diagnostic period than MRI (10/23, 43% of patients). The predominant finding on brain 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was lobar hypometabolism, being observed in 21 of 23 (91.3%) patients. Hypometabolism was most commonly observed in the parietal lobe followed by the occipital lobe. An entire subset of antibody-positive patients, anti–N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (5 patients), had normal MRI results and abnormal 18F-FDG PET/CT findings whereas the other subsets demonstrated a greater heterogeneity. Conclusion: Brain 18F-FDG PET/CT may play a significant role in the initial evaluation of patients with clinically suspected antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis. Given that it is more often abnormal when compared with MRI in the acute setting, this molecular imaging technique may be better positioned as an early biomarker of disease so that treatment may be initiated earlier, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conditions such as PSP, autoimmune encephalitis, chronic schizophrenia, alcohol related brain damage, and late onset psychiatric disorders may be associated with patterns of frontal hypometabolism on FDG-PET.
“Conditions such as PSP, autoimmune encephalitis, chronic schizophrenia, alcohol related brain damage and late onset psychiatric disorders [137–139] may also be associated with patterns of frontal hypometabolism on FDG-PET and therefore FDG-PET should be used in combination with history and other examinations available [140–142].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [138]
Cites
Titulaer, M. J., McCracken, L., Gabilondo, I., Armangué, T., Glaser, C., Iizuka, T., Honig, L. S., Benseler, S. M., Kawachi, I., Martinez-Hernandez, E., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70310-1 · Cited by 3,165 · see citing works
Dalmau, J., Tüzün, E., Wu, H., Masjuan, J., Rossi, J. E., Voloschin, A., Baehring, J. M., Shimazaki, H., Koide, R., King, D., et al. (2007) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21050 · Cited by 2,492 · see citing works
A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
Thabane, L., Mbuagbaw, L., Zhang, S., Samaan, Z., Marcucci, M., Ye, C., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., Dennis, B., Kosa, D., et al. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-92 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Wesselingh, R., Butzkueven, H., Buzzard, K., Tarlinton, D., O'Brien, T. J., & Monif, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02066 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Solnes, L. B., Jones, K. M., Rowe, S. P., Pattanayak, P., Nalluri, A., Venkatesan, A., Probasco, J. C., & Javadi, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2017-02-16
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1307-1313
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- PMC
- PMC6944181
- OpenAlex
- W2588135523
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007955)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
- Keywords
- autoimmune encephalitis, 18F-FDG PET/CT, brain MRI, neuroimaging, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, diagnostic biomarkers, early diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Encephalitis, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Hashimoto Disease, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review