Cited by 214Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET

Open access

Lodge, Martin A.·2017·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353PMC PMC5373499

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

F-FDG PET. Growing literature suggests that the difference between SUVs measured before and after treatment can be used to predict tumor response at an early stage. SUV is, however, associated with multiple sources of variability, and to best use SUV for response assessment, an understanding of the repeatability of the technique is required. Test-retest studies involve repeated scanning of the same patient on the same scanner using the same protocol no more than a few days apart and provide basic information on the repeatability of the technique. Multiple test-retest studies have been performed to assess SUV repeatability, although a comparison of reports is complicated by the use of different methodologies and statistical metrics. This article reviews the available data, addressing issues such as different repeatability metrics, relative units, log transformation, and asymmetric limits of repeatability. When acquired with careful attention to protocol, tumor SUV has a within-subject coefficient of variation of approximately 10%. In a response assessment setting, SUV reductions of more than 25% and increases of more than 33% are unlikely to be due to measurement variability. Broader margins may be required for sites with less rigorous protocol compliance, but in general, SUV is a highly repeatable imaging biomarker that is ideally suited to monitoring tumor response to treatment in individual patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
Wahl, R. L., Jacene, H., Kasamon, Y., & Lodge, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 · Cited by 3,777
Self-citation
Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F‐18)2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose: Validation of method
Phelps, M. E., Huang, S. C., Hoffman, E. J., Selin, C. E., Sokoloff, L., & Kuhl, D. E. (1979) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410060502 · Cited by 2,417
Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations
Young, H. E., Baum, R. P., Cremerius, U., Herholz, K., Hoekstra, O. S., Lammertsma, A. A., Pruim, J., & Price, P. (1999) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00229-4 · Cited by 1,716
SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value?
Keyes, J. W. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 803
PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial
Lordick, F., Ott, K., Krause, B., Weber, W., Becker, K., Stein, H. J., Lorenzen, S., Schuster, T., Wieder, H. A., Herrmann, K., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70244-9 · Cited by 801
FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma.
Hutchings, M., Loft, A., Hansen, M., Pedersen, L., Buhl, T., Jurlander, J., Buus, S., Keiding, S., d'Amore, F., Boesen, A., et al. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-06-2252 · Cited by 757
Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.
Shankar, L. K., Hoffman, J. M., Bacharach, S. L., Graham, M. M., Karp, J. S., Lammertsma, A. A., Larson, S. M., Mankoff, D. A., Siegel, B. A., den Abbeele, A. V., et al. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 677
A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements
Adams, M. C., Turkington, T. G., Wilson, J. M., & Wong, T. Z. (2010) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.10.4923 · Cited by 662
Untitled work
(2004) · PubMed · Cited by 653

Show all 47 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 214

Full-Body Tumor Response Heterogeneity of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
Santoro-Fernandes, V., Schott, B., Weisman, A. J., Lokre, O., Cho, S. Y., Perlman, S. B., Perk, T., & Jeraj, R. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.267809 · Cited by 9
Evaluating a radiotherapy deep learning synthetic CT algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis
Wyatt, J., Kaushik, S. S., Cozzini, C., Pearson, R., Petrides, G. S., Wiesinger, F., McCallum, H. M., & Maxwell, R. J. (2024) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-024-00617-3 · Cited by 9
Repeatability of quantitative parameters of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and biochemical tumour and specific bone remodelling markers in prostate cancer bone metastases
Wassberg, C., Lubberink, M., Sørensen, J. C. H., & Johansson, S. (2017) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-017-0289-9 · Cited by 9
Very Early Response Evaluation by PET/MR in Patients with Lung Cancer—Timing and Feasibility
Langer, N. H., Langer, S. W., Johannesen, H. H., Hansen, A. E., Costa, J. C., Klausen, T. L., Forman, J. L., Olin, A. B., Rasmussen, S. H., Sørensen, J. B., et al. (2019) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics9010035 · Cited by 9
Comparison of Image Quality and Semi-quantitative Measurements with Digital PET/CT and Standard PET/CT from Different Vendors
Kim, S. H., Song, B., Kim, H. W., & Won, K. S. (2020) · Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13139-020-00661-8 · Cited by 9
Repeatability of Radiomic Features of Brown Adipose Tissue
Nazeri, A., Crandall, J. P., Fraum, T. J., & Wahl, R. L. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.248674 · Cited by 9
Involvement of cancer-derived EMT cells in the accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the hypoxic cancer microenvironment
Sugita, S., Yamato, M., Hatabu, T., & Kataoka, Y. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88414-1 · Cited by 9
Robust maximization of tumor control probability for radicality constrained radiotherapy dose painting by numbers of head and neck cancer
Grönlund, E., Almhagen, E., Johansson, S., Tranéus, E., & Ahnesjö, A. (2019) · Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.phro.2019.11.004 · Cited by 9
Observer variability in the assessment of renal 18F-FDG uptake in kidney transplant recipients
Jadoul, A., Lovinfosse, P., Bouquegneau, A., Weekers, L. E., Pottel, H., Hustinx, R., & Jouret, F. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61032-z · Cited by 9
Measuring repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI biomarkers improves evaluation of biological response to radiotherapy in lung cancer
Sridharan, N., Salem, A., Little, R. A., Tariq, M., Cheung, S., Dubec, M. J., Finn, C. F., Parker, G. J. M., Porta, N., & O’Connor, J. P. B. (2024) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-024-10970-7 · Cited by 9
[18F]FDG PET/CT performs better than CT in determining the bone biopsy site : randomized controlled clinical trial
Chang, Y., Gu, Y., Ruan, S., Xu, S., Sun, J., Jiang, Z., Yao, G., Wang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2024) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1186/s40644-024-00804-6 · Cited by 8
Test–retest repeatability and interobserver variation of healthy tissue metabolism using 18F-FDG PET/CT of the thorax among lung cancer patients
Malaih, A. A., Dunn, J., Nygård, L., Kovacs, D. G., Andersen, F. L., Barrington, S. F., & Fischer, B. M. (2022) · Nuclear Medicine Communications · doi:10.1097/mnm.0000000000001537 · Cited by 8
Radiomics analysis of bone marrow biopsy locations in [18F]FDG PET/CT images for measurable residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
Milara, E., Alonso, R., Masseing, L., Seiffert, A. P., Gómez‐Grande, A., Aguilera, E. J. G., Martínez‐López, J., & González, P. S. (2023) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-023-01265-0 · Cited by 8
A three-time-point method for assessing kinetic parameters of 64 Cu-labeled Ramucirumab trapping in VEGFR-2 positive lung tumors
Laffon, É., & Marthan, R. (2017) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8
Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
Machado, M. A. D., Menezes, V. O. M. D. O., Namías, M., Vieira, N. S., Queiroz, C. C., Matheoud, R., Alessio, A. M., & Oliveira, M. L. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology · doi:10.2967/jnmt.118.213405 · Cited by 8
Automated Quantitative Analysis of American College of Radiology PET Phantom Images
DiFilippo, F. P., Patel, M., & Patel, S. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology · doi:10.2967/jnmt.118.221317 · Cited by 8
The added value of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in the assessment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis in lung cancer
Mendoza, D. P., & Digumarthy, S. R. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.10.10 · Cited by 8
PET-CT for characterising TB infection (TBI) in immunocompetent subjects: a systematic review.
Kim, J. W., Munavvar, R., Kamil, A., & Haldar, P. (2023) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001749 · Cited by 5
Challenging the significance of SUV-based parameters in a large-scale retrospective study on lung lesions
Pini, C., Kirienko, M., Gelardi, F., Bossi, P., Rahal, D., Toschi, L., Ninatti, G., Rodari, M., Marulli, G., Antunovic, L., et al. (2024) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1186/s40644-024-00807-3 · Cited by 8
Quantitation of cancer treatment response by 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT: multi-center assessment of measurement variability using AUTO-PERCIST™
Readers, Q. P., Joo Hyun, O., Lim, S. J., Wang, H., Leal, J. P., Shu, H. G., & Wahl, R. L. (2021) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-021-00754-1 · Cited by 7
Multicenter quantitative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performance harmonization: use of hottest voxels towards more robust quantification
Vosoughi, H., Momennezhad, M., Emami, F., Hajizadeh, M., Rahmim, A., & Geramifar, P. (2023) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-22-443 · Cited by 7
Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values
Kaneta, T., Daisaki, H., Ogawa, M., Liu, E., Iizuka, H., Arisawa, T., Hino-Shishikura, A., Yoshida, K., & Inoue, T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192549 · Cited by 7
Response-to-repeatability of quantitative imaging features for longitudinal response assessment
Lin, C., Harmon, S. A., Bradshaw, T., Eickhoff, J. C., Perlman, S. B., Liu, G., & Jeraj, R. (2018) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aafa0a · Cited by 7
A Retrospective Study of predicting risk of Metastasis among FDG-avid Bone Lesions in 18F-FDG PET/CT
Yao, G., Zhou, Y., Gu, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, M., Sun, J. P., Luo, Q., & Zhao, H. (2020) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.45096 · Cited by 7
l-[5-11C]Glutamine PET imaging noninvasively tracks dynamic responses of glutaminolysis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
Zhang, Y., Xie, L., Fujinaga, M., Kurihara, Y., Ogawa, M., Kumata, K., Mori, W., Kokufuta, T., Nengaki, N., Wakizaka, H., et al. (2024) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2024.07.023 · Cited by 6
Evaluation of manual and automated approaches for segmentation and extraction of quantitative indices from [18F]FDG PET-CT images
Krokos, G., Kotwal, T., Malaih, A. A., Barrington, S. F., Jackson, P. A., Hicks, R. J., Marsden, P. K., & Fischer, B. M. (2023) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad160e · Cited by 6
Multicentric study on the reproducibility and robustness of PET-based radiomics features with a realistic activity painting phantom
Kallos-Balogh, P., Vas, N. F., Toth, Z. G., Szakáll, S., Szabo, P., Garai, I., Képes, Z., Forgács, A., Egeresi, L. S., Magnus, D., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309540 · Cited by 6
Novel Functional Radiomics for Prediction of Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Avidity in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
Choi, W., Jia, Y., Kwak, J., Werner‐Wasik, M., Dicker, A. P., Simone, N. L., Storozynsky, E., Jain, V., & Vinogradskiy, Y. Y. (2024) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.23.00241 · Cited by 6
Artificial nutrition in patients with cancer has no impact on tumour glucose metabolism: Results of the PETANC Study
Deshayes, E., de Forges, H., Fraisse, J., Eberlé, M., Guillemard, S., Fallières, A., Pouget, J., Tétreau, R., Kotzki, P., Santoro, L., et al. (2018) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.033 · Cited by 6
An External, Independent Validation of anO-(2-[18F]Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET Automatic Segmentation Network on a Single-Center, Prospective Dataset of Patients with Glioblastoma
Barry, N., Kendrick, J., Rowshanfarzad, P., Hassan, G. M., Francis, R. J., Bucknell, N. W., Koh, E., Scott, A. M., Ebert, M. A., Gutsche, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.268925 · Cited by 5
Long Axial Field-of-view PET
Mehadji, B., Spencer, B. A., Alberts, I., Karakatsanis, N. A., Roncali, E., & Nardo, L. (2025) · PET Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2025.07.003 · Cited by 5
Radiomics and Imaging Genomics for Evaluation of Tumor Response
Lee, G., Bak, S., Lee, H., Choi, J., & Park, H. (2020) · Medical radiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31171-1_13 · Cited by 5
Feasibility of noise-reduction reconstruction technology based on non-local-mean principle in SiPM-PET/CT
Shirakawa, Y., Matsutomo, N., & Suyama, J. (2024) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103303 · Cited by 5
Biphasic contrast-enhanced [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging to improve the detection of local relapse of prostate cancer
Mamlins, E., Novruzov, E., Watabe, T., Mori, Y., Dabir, M., Mattes‐György, K., Antke, C., Henke, J., Boschheidgen, M., Kirchner, J., et al. (2025) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-025-01252-4 · Cited by 4
PSMA-Targeted Intracellular Self-Assembled Probe for Enhanced PET Imaging
Zhang, X., Ma, L., Cai, K., Guo, X., Zhang, G., Dong, J., Zheng, Y., Su, X., Tao, T., Li, X., et al. (2024) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00572 · Cited by 4
Understandings 18 FDG PET radiomics and its application to lymphoma
Ceriani, L., Milan, L., Chauvie, S., & Zucca, E. (2025) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.20074 · Cited by 4
Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages
Boś, A., Cegła, P., Matuszewski, K., Konstanty, E., Piotrowski, A., Gross, M., Malicki, J., & Kozak, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93436-w · Cited by 4
The impact of introducing deep learning based [18F]FDG PET denoising on EORTC and PERCIST therapeutic response assessments in digital PET/CT
Weyts, K., Lequesne, J., Johnson, A., Curcio, H., Parzy, A., Coquan, E., & Lasnon, C. (2024) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-024-01128-z · Cited by 4
Therapy monitoring with PET in cancer patients: achievements, opportunities and challenges ahead for the PET community
Aide, N., & Fanti, S. (2017) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3721-5 · Cited by 4
Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of 11C-Acetate Cardiac PET Imaging
Shi, X., Li, N., Ding, H., Dang, Y., Hu, G., Liu, S., Cui, J., Zhang, Y., Li, F., Zhang, H., et al. (2018) · Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1155/2018/9193403 · Cited by 4
The Role of [18F]FDG PET Imaging for the Assessment of Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review
Dondi, F., Bellini, P., Cossandi, M., Camoni, L., Rinaldi, R., Viganò, G. L., & Bertagna, F. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15131626 · Cited by 3
Repeatability of brown adipose tissue activation measured by [18F]FDG PET after beta3-adrenergic stimuli in a mouse model
Faria, D. D. P., Vera, C. C. D. S., Marques, F. L. N., & Sapienza, M. T. (2023) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2023.108390 · Cited by 3
The Potential of Basal F-18-FDG PET/CT in Evaluating Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Tumor Resection of Stage IB(T2, ≤ 3 cm With VPI, N0, M0)NSCLC
Lei, B., Zhang, H., Sun, J., Wang, L., Ruan, M., Yan, H., Zhang, A., Chang, C., Yang, H., Huang, G., et al. (2024) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.001 · Cited by 3
Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in experimental human malaria, a prospective cohort study
Woodford, J., Gillman, A., Jenvey, P., Roberts, J., Woolley, S., Barber, B. E., Fernandez, M., Rose, S., Thomas, P. A., Anstey, N. M., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09748-y · Cited by 3
Quantitative Assessments of Tumor Activity in a General Oncologic PET/CT Population: Which Metric Minimizes Tracer Uptake Time Dependence?
İnce, S., Laforest, R. A., Itani, M., Prasad, V., Derenoncourt, P.-R., Crandall, J. P., Ashrafinia, S., Smith, A. M., Wahl, R. L., & Fraum, T. J. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.123.266469 · Cited by 3
The study of dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT-based models in predicting malignant solitary pulmonary lesions
Zhang, L., Wan, X., Ji, K., Chen, K., Zhu, X., Su, Q., Zhai, S., & Xu, W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-18677-5 · Cited by 2
Hypo-segmentation of 18F-BPA PET-based boron distribution: a pragmatic approach for efficient BNCT treatment planning
Teng, Y.-C., Chen, J., Zhong, W.-B., Lin, Q., & Liu, Y. (2025) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-025-01341-4 · Cited by 2
The prognostic role of maximum tumor dissemination derived by PET/CT in oncological diseases: a systematic review
Tasevski, S., Treglia, G., Marin, A., Bertagna, F., & Albano, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1726567 · Cited by 2
Evaluation of Low-dose Whole-body FDG PET with SiPM-based PET/CT Scanner: Visual and Semi-quantitative Analyses Using Random Sampling from Full-dose Scan Data
Inomata, T., Sato, K., Ibaraki, M., Kominami, M., Kinoshita, F., Shinohara, Y., Kato, M., & Kinoshita, T. (2023) · Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology · doi:10.6009/jjrt.2023-1365 · Cited by 2
Comprehensive literature review of oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced PET/CT: a step forward?
Metrard, G., Cohen, C., & Bailly, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1373260 · Cited by 3
Negative-predictive value of SUVmax for Ascertaining the efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer
Anai, M., Inoue, H., Saruwatari, K., Oda, S., Shiraishi, S., Akaike, K., Imamura, K., Jodai, T., Sakata, S., Iyama, S., et al. (2024) · Respiratory Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.001 · Cited by 2
The Importance of PET Quantification for Prognosis and Treatment Response Monitoring.
Abgral, R., Bailly, C., Boellaard, R., Bourhis, D., & Carlier, T. (2025) · PET Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2025.07.007 · Cited by 2
On the 18F–fluoride PET imaging quantification to predict 223Ra-dichloride treatment response
Laffon, É., de Clermont-Gallerande, H., Marthan, R., & Paycha, F. (2017) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3868-0 · Cited by 2
Validation of Quantitative Accuracy and Variability in 177Lu Imaging Using Monte Carlo Simulation
Daisaki, H., Kubota, C., Ishikawa, K., Sato, M., Yasumoto, Y., Fukai, S., & Sakashita, T. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology · doi:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1451 · Cited by 1
Advanced monitoring of TOF+PSF reconstruction performance in digital PET/CT: Clinical implications from the uMI 550 evaluation
Kafhali, M. E., Tahmasbi, M., Rahmouni, A., Khalis, M., Moutaoukkil, A. E., Sebihi, R., & Kessioui, A. E. (2025) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence in oncological positron emission tomography: advancing image analysis and interpretation
Nakajo, M., Hirahara, D., Hirahara, M., Eizuru, Y., Tani, A., Kanzaki, F., Takumi, K., Kamimura, K., & Yoshiura, T. (2025) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2025.107187 · Cited by 1
Patlak-PBNT: a simple population-based Patlak model to generate [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 Ki parametric images for shortened total-body PET scan
Li, L., Gu, W., Yang, W., Wei, W., Liu, J., Huang, G., Ge, J., Luo, G., Shiming, X. U., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-026-00840-0 · Cited by 1
PET-guided early identification of CAR-T candidates in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a multidisciplinary expert consensus
Guerra, L., Albano, D., Angelillo, P., Rocco, A. D., Farina, M., Farolfi, A., Tarantino, V., Visco, C., & Zinzani, P. L. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-026-07999-9 · Cited by 1
Evaluation of a model-based attenuation correction method on whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
Kubo, H., Nemoto, A., Ukon, N., & Ito, H. (2021) · Radiological Physics and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12194-020-00605-z · Cited by 1
Estimating normal metabolic activity for disease quantification via PET/CT images
Li, J., Udupa, J. K., Tong, Y., & Torigian, D. A. (2023) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging · doi:10.1117/12.2654882 · Cited by 1
Is There Novel 18 F-FDG Biodistribution in the Digital PET/CT Era? A Real-World Data Analysis
Babacan, G. B., Özülker, F., Şahin, O., Güven, O., Kanatsız, O., Alçın, G., & Özülker, T. (2025) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/cbr.2024.0226 · Cited by 1
Fast 4D-PET parametric imaging computation at the whole field of view level: Reliability under simulated conditions of PET KinetiX, a dedicated software solution
Faure, S., Paillet, A., Comtat, C., & Besson, F. L. (2025) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07285-0 · Cited by 2
The clinical consequences of functional adrenal uptake in the absence of cross-sectional mass on FDG-PET/CT in oncology patients
Hsiao, R., Chow, A., Kluijfhout, W. P., Bongers, P. J., Verzijl, R., Metser, U., Veit‐Haibach, P., & Pasternak, J. D. (2022) · Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00423-021-02379-3 · Cited by 1
Semi-automated quantification of 18 F-FDG PET-CT in pulmonary TB contacts and its association with prospective outcomesPreprint
Kim, J. W., Kamil, A., Lee, J., Novsarka, I., & Haldar, P. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.04.25331303 · Cited by 1
Management of PET-avid thyroid nodules in cancer patients
Bozin, M. (2017) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)
Positronenemissionstomographie beim Hodgkin-Lymphom
Kobe, C., Baues, C., Fuchs, M., Drzezga, A. E., Borchmann, P., & Dietlein, M. (2018) · Der Onkologe · doi:10.1007/s00761-018-0341-z
The two sides of the coin of psychosocial stress: evaluation by positron emission tomography
Feltes, P. K. (2018) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Improved image reconstruction of
Kirchner, J., O’Donoghue, J. A., Becker, A. S., & Ulaner, G. A. (2021)
Importance of measurement repeatability of semi-quantitative imaging through PET-CT and PET-MR imaging in oncology
Priola, A. M., & Priola, S. M. (2019) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2019.05.15
System resolution versus image uncertainty for positron emission tomography scanners
Studen, A., & Clinthorne, N. H. (2022) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.9.3.033501
Preliminary protocol for measuring the reproducibility and accuracy of flow values on digital PET/CT systems in [15O]H2O myocardial perfusion imaging using a flow phantom
Siekkinen, R., Partanen, H., Kukola, L., Tolvanen, T., Fenwick, A., Smith, N. A. S., Teräs, M., Saraste, A., & Teuho, J. (2024) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-024-00654-y
Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Experimental Human Malaria to Identify Organ-Specific Changes in Morphology and Glucose Metabolism: A Prospective Cohort Study
Woodford, J., Gillman, A., Jenvey, P., Roberts, J., Woolley, S., Barber, B. E., Fernandez, M., Rose, S., Thomas, P. A., Anstey, N. M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1201/9781003298038-36
Automation is crucial for precision medicine
Wells, R. G., & Ruddy, T. D. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102090
Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Mohymen, A. A., Farag, H. I., Reda, S., Monem, A. S., & Ali, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Medical Physics · doi:10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24
Advanced Image Analysis to Select Patients for Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy and Assess Treatment Response
Floberg, J. M., Kyriakopoulos, C. E., & Cho, S. Y. (2025) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2025.101805
Predicting Symptomatic Cardiotoxicity in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab: Insights from a Brazilian Real-World CohortPreprint
Alves, W. E. F. M., de Oliveira, M. A., Alberto, T., Inafuku, C. Y., dos Santos, M. J., Souza, C. D. P., & Soares, J. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7093569/v1
Construction of a multimodal esophageal cancer prognostic model with screening of key genes and investigation of their biological functions
Chang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, X., Bai, Q., Luo, H., Deng, P., Yang, L., & Li, X. (2025) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-025-03404-3
Emerging non-invasive imaging biomarkers of Ki-67 in pancreatic cancer: Toward predictive precision oncology
Wu, Y., Tian, R., Li, X., Guo, J.-Y., Tang, J., & Zhou, C. (2025) · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology · doi:10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468 · Cited by 1
Additional file 2 of Preliminary protocol for measuring the reproducibility and accuracy of flow values on digital PET/CT systems in [15O]H2O myocardial perfusion imaging using a flow phantom
Siekkinen, R., Partanen, H., Kukola, L., Tolvanen, T., Fenwick, A., Smith, N. A. S., Teräs, M., Saraste, A., & Teuho, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26741114
Additional file 2 of Improved image reconstruction of 89Zr-immunoPET studies using a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm
Kirchner, J., O’Donoghue, J. A., Becker, A. S., & Ulaner, G. A. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13612644
Additional file 1 of A proper protocol for routine 18F-FDG uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scans
Hu, H., Huang, Y., Sun, H., Zhou, K., Jiang, L., Zhong, J., Chen, L., Wang, L., 韩彦江, & Wu, H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26616529
Additional file 1 of Preliminary protocol for measuring the reproducibility and accuracy of flow values on digital PET/CT systems in [15O]H2O myocardial perfusion imaging using a flow phantom
Siekkinen, R., Partanen, H., Kukola, L., Tolvanen, T., Fenwick, A., Smith, N. A. S., Teräs, M., Saraste, A., & Teuho, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26741111
Additional file 2 of Clinical application of a population-based input function (PBIF) for a shortened dynamic whole-body FDG-PET/CT protocol in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by immunotherapy
Pavoine, M., Thuillier, P., Karakatsanis, N., Legoupil, D., Amrane, K., Floch, R., Pennec, R. L., Salaün, P., Abgral, R., & Bourhis, D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26651202
Additional file 3 of Clinical application of a population-based input function (PBIF) for a shortened dynamic whole-body FDG-PET/CT protocol in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by immunotherapy
Pavoine, M., Thuillier, P., Karakatsanis, N., Legoupil, D., Amrane, K., Floch, R., Pennec, R. L., Salaün, P., Abgral, R., & Bourhis, D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26651205
Additional file 1 of Cross-validation study between the HRRT and the PET component of the SIGNA PET/MRI system with focus on neuroimaging
Mannheim, J. G., Cheng, J.-C. (., Vafai, N. M., Shahinfard, E., English, C., McKenzie, J., Zhang, J., Barlow, L., & Sossi, V. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14129408
Additional file 1 of Day-to-day variability of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 accumulation in primary prostate cancer: effects on tracer uptake and visual interpretation
olde Heuvel, J., de Wit-van der Veen, B. J., Donswijk, M. L., Slump, C. H., & Stokkel, M. P. M. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13167402
Additional file 3 of Improved image reconstruction of 89Zr-immunoPET studies using a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm
Kirchner, J., O’Donoghue, J. A., Becker, A. S., & Ulaner, G. A. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13612647
Additional file 1 of Improved image reconstruction of 89Zr-immunoPET studies using a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm
Kirchner, J., O’Donoghue, J. A., Becker, A. S., & Ulaner, G. A. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13612641
Additional file 1 of Clinical application of a population-based input function (PBIF) for a shortened dynamic whole-body FDG-PET/CT protocol in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by immunotherapy
Pavoine, M., Thuillier, P., Karakatsanis, N., Legoupil, D., Amrane, K., Floch, R., Pennec, R. L., Salaün, P., Abgral, R., & Bourhis, D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26651199
Additional file 1 of Repeatability of deuterium metabolic imaging of healthy volunteers at 3 T
Bøgh, N., Væggemose, M., Schulte, R. F., Hansen, E. S. S., & Laustsen, C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26692711
A novel population‐based input function integral estimation method for Ki parametric imaging with shortened dynamic 18F‐FDG PET scans
Chen, L., Wu, Y., Chen, Z., Cheng, Z., Duan, Y., Wang, H., Han, J., Liang, D., Zheng, H., Wang, M., et al. (2026) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.70270
Repeatability of semi-quantitative [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT measurements in pancreatobiliary cancers: a test-retest study
Henrar, R., Cysouw, M., Palard-Novello, X., Schwarte, L. A., Raijmakers, P., de Geus-Oei, L. D., Vahrmeijer, A., Kazemier, G., Windhorst, A., Boellaard, R., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07738-6
Impact of vial geometry on 18F radionuclide calibrator response using 68Ge/68Ga surrogate sources
Severi, F., Bovone, P., Amico, J., Pasetto, S., Salgarello, M., & Gorgoni, G. (2026) · Applied Radiation and Isotopes · doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2026.112522
MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction From PET/MRI Elucidates the Biphasic Impact of Hepatic Steatosis on Liver 18F-FDG Uptake.
Meng, Z., Lin, M., Chu, T.-C., Zhu, D.-D., Peng, L., Sun, M.-X., Peng, S., Feng, G., & Gao, X. (2026) · Journal of computer assisted tomography · doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000001849
Enhancing reader confidence through dual-time imaging and alternative reconstruction algorithms with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging in local relapsed castration-sensitive prostate cancer?
Novruzov, E., Sheikh, G. T., Feisthauer, A., Schmitt, D. R., Mattes‐György, K., Antke, C., Kuhlmann, J. M., Mori, Y., Henke, J., Cardinale, J., et al. (2026) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-026-01407-x
Prognostic role of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients affected by adrenocortical carcinoma and treated with chemotherapy
Dondi, F., Bettini, D. L., Cosentini, D., Ambrosini, R., Rodella, S., Trevisan, B., Abate, A., Tamburello, M., Cremaschi, V., Casole, G., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-026-07794-6
The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Management of Cervical Cancer
Zheng, Y., & Cheng, G. (2026) · Journal of Biosciences and Medicines · doi:10.4236/jbm.2026.143034
Extraction et analyse de biomarqueurs issus des imageries TEP et IRM pour l'amélioration de la planification de traitement en radiothérapie
Reuzé, S. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/283aded3z5687z40c8z93bfzaea2941d657c
Contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in ultra-high sensitivity long-axial field-of-view lymphoma PET: amplified quantification problems?
Penner, J.-L., Blomgren, A., Weissensee, A., Amon, M., Acikgöz, S., Mingels, C., Ferdinandus, J., Zangeneh, F. A., Novak, U., Pabst, T., et al. (2026) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-026-00866-4
Bibliography
(2026) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781394220243.biblio

Authors: Lodge, M. A.
Affiliations: Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author: Lodge, Martin A.
ORCID: Lodge, Martin A.
Venue: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher: Society of Nuclear Medicine
Published: 2017-02-23
Volume: 58
Issue: 4
Pages: 523-532
ISSN: 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
2159-662X
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353
PMC: PMC5373499
OpenAlex: W2590848133
Cited by: 214
References: 47
Citations by year: 2026: 26 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14
FWCI: 3.35
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Locations: Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Radiological Society of North America (HHSN268201300071C)
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
National Institutes of Health (HHSN268201300071C)
National Cancer Institute (U01CA140204)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords: standardized uptake value, 18F-FDG PET, test-retest repeatability, tumor response assessment, within-subject coefficient of variation, imaging biomarkers, treatment response monitoring, logarithmic transformation, tumor imaging
MeSH terms: Biological Transport, Humans, Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks