Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the TAG mound and stockwork complex with Cyprus-type, massive sulfide deposits

Open access
Hannington, M.D., Galley, A.G., Herzig, P.M., Petersen, S.·1998·Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program

Abstract

Drilling of the active Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) deposit indicates that the size of the mound-stockwork complex is approximately 3.9 million t, including 2.7 million t of massive and semi-massive sulfide (~2% Cu) at the seafloor and 1.2 million t of mineralized breccias (~1% Cu) in a subseafloor stockwork.Quartz-pyrite veining in the stockwork zone extends from about 40 meters below seafloor (mbsf) to a depth of 95 mbsf.Siliceous wallrock breccias in the lower part of the stockwork grade abruptly into chloritized basalt breccias at the margins of the mineralized zone, and massive sulfides at the flanks of the deposit onlap relatively unaltered, partially hematized basalts.The pipe-like dimensions of the stockwork zone do not exceed the diameter of the sulfide mound.Comparisons with samples collected during earlier dive series confirm that the vent complexes at the surface of the mound are not representative of the bulk composition of the deposit.Steep vertical metal zonation within the mound suggests that a long history of hydrothermal reworking has effectively stripped the constituents that are soluble at lower temperatures from the massive sulfides and concentrated them at the top of the deposit through a process of zone refining.The bulk of the mound is composed of massive pyrite and anhydrite-cemented breccias.The massive anhydrite (~165,000 t) occupies a high-temperature zone, immediately beneath the central Black Smoker Complex and above the quartz-rich stockwork.Fracturing in the underlying quartz-pyrite stockwork also has resulted in anhydrite veining at considerable depths in the stockwork zone.Despite the abundance of anhydrite in the mound, the amount of seawater penetrating the region of hightemperature upflow is small in comparison to the total mass flux of hydrothermal fluid.The anhydrite has been deposited by conductive heating of a small amount of entrained seawater at the margins of high-temperature conduits, and little or no mixing has occurred with the end-member fluids.Collapse of the anhydrite-supported portion of the mound following major episodes of hydrothermal upflow has caused extensive in situ brecciation of the mound and is an important mechanism for the formation of "breccia ores" in the deposit.Although anhydrite is not well preserved in the geologic record, given its retrograde solubility, it has likely played an important role in the development of similar ore types in ancient massive sulfides.The morphology, size, and bulk composition of the TAG mound-stockwork complex is identical to that of some of the largest Cyprus-type massive sulfide deposits in the Troodos ophiolite.Typical Cyprus-type deposits comprise massive brecciated pyrite ores, underlain by a vertically extensive quartz-pyrite-chlorite stockwork.Sandy pyrite or conglomeratic ore, similar to that found in the TAG mound, is characteristic of the upper parts of Cyprus-type deposits.Textures in these ores, previously attributed to seafloor weathering and erosion, are most likely the result of anhydrite dissolution.Massive, granular pyrite (hard, compact ore), with abundant vuggy cavities lined by idiomorphic pyrite and quartz, occur below the conglomeratic ores and closely resemble sections of massive pyrite and pyrite-silica breccias from the TAG mound.At TAG, seafloor oxidation of the sulfides is currently taking place, even as the deposit is forming.Fe-oxide gossans have developed at the surface of the mound as a result of weathering of chimney debris.These deposits are modern analogs of the extensive ochers that typically overlie the massive sulfide deposits in Cyprus.By analogy with TAG, a number of the weathering features of Cyprus-type deposits (e.g., red clays, leached lavas), previously thought to be products of acid alteration by meteoric groundwaters, may have formed while the deposits were still on the seafloor.Low-temperature venting through this material has locally produced distinctive red cherts (silicified Fe oxides).This material is common within the mound and in the underlying basalts and closely resembles the red jaspers found throughout the pillow lava sections in Cyprus.Silicification in the upper part of the TAG mound also has produced a cherty, sulfide carapace at the top of the deposit that inhibits further degradation of the mound by seafloor weathering.This may have important implications for the long-term preservation of the deposit, although dissection of the mound along active fault scarps may eventually expose its interior to seafloor oxidation.An estimated growth rate for the TAG deposit, based on a total accumulation of 2.7 million t of massive sulfides and a cumulative venting history of 5 to 10 k.y., is between 500 and 1,000 t per yr.This is consistent with observed growth rates for the central Black Smoker Complex and with estimates of mass fluxes from heat and fluid flow at black smoker vents on the East Pacific Rise.Although TAG is among the largest of the known mid-ocea

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.158.217.1998

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Hannington, M. D., Galley, A. G., Herzig, P. M., & Petersen, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program
Published
1998-02
OpenAlex
W2114082272
Cited by
180
References
1
FWCI
5.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the TAG mound and stockwork complex with Cyprus-type, massive sulfide deposits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.158.217.1998
The paper
Hannington, M. D., Galley, A. G., Herzig, P. M., & Petersen, S. (1998). Comparison of the TAG mound and stockwork complex with Cyprus-type, massive sulfide deposits. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.158.217.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.