Cited by 132Robotic Locomotion and ControlBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Forward locomotion of the nematode C. elegans is achieved through modulation of a single gait

Open access
Berri, Stefano, Boyle, Jordan H., Tassieri, Manlio, Hope, Ian A., Cohen, Netta·2009·HFSP Journal

Abstract

The ability of an animal to locomote through its environment depends crucially on the interplay between its active endogenous control and the physics of its interactions with the environment. The nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans serves as an ideal model system for studying the respective roles of neural control and biomechanics, as well as the interaction between them. With only 302 neurons in a hard-wired neural circuit, the worm's apparent anatomical simplicity belies its behavioural complexity. Indeed, C. elegans exhibits a rich repertoire of complex behaviors, the majority of which are mediated by its adaptive undulatory locomotion. The conventional wisdom is that two kinematically distinct C. elegans locomotion behaviors-swimming in liquids and crawling on dense gel-like media-correspond to distinct locomotory gaits. Here we analyze the worm's motion through a series of different media and reveal a smooth transition from swimming to crawling, marked by a linear relationship between key locomotion metrics. These results point to a single locomotory gait, governed by the same underlying control mechanism. We further show that environmental forces play only a small role in determining the shape of the worm, placing conditions on the minimal pattern of internal forces driving locomotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2976/1.3082260

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. elegans locomotes in an undulatory fashion, generating thrust by propagating dorsoventral bends along its body.

    “C. elegans locomotes in an undulatory fashion, generating thrust by propagating dorsoventral bends along its body with a wavelength of undulation that depends on the properties of the medium through which it moves (Berri, Boyle, Tassieri, Hope, & Cohen, 2009; Fang-Yen et al., 2010; Gray & Lissmann, 1964; Lebois et al., 2012).”

    From Potential role of a ventral nerve cord central pattern generator in forward and backward locomotion in<i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> (2018) · cites this paper as Berri et al., 2009

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes C. elegans locomotion as an S-shaped travelling wave and explains that a time-reversible bending motion cannot propel the worm. The crawling-and-swimming section also links body undulations to thrust. Our copy does not identify the bends specifically as dorsoventral, so that anatomical detail remains unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The normal drag coefficient for agar C⊥,agar is 128 × 10−3 kg·s−1, obtained by taking Kagar = 40 and Niebur and Erdös' estimate for C||,agar.

    “We previously estimated the normal drag coefficient C⊥,agar from recordings of wild type worms using our motion simulator (Berri et al., 2009). Briefly, we found the ratio of drag coefficients to be in the range Kagar ≈ 30–40; taking a value of Kagar = 40 and Niebur and Erdös’ estimate for C||,agar gives C⊥,agar = 128 × 10−3 kg·s−1, which will be used in what follows.”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Berri et al., 2009

    In “The groove is not required for crawling” (page not specified), the paper reports an agar drag-coefficient ratio of K = 32 ± 4, estimated using a simulator. “Estimating power dissipation” explains how K could be combined with a drag coefficient, but uses an estimate from Korta et al. (2007), not Niebur and Erdös. Our copy does not give C⊥,agar = 128 × 10−3 kg·s−1 or calculate it using K = 40. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Forward swimming and crawling in C. elegans are two extremes in a spectrum of behaviors, with intermediate waveforms revealed in appropriate intermediate media.

    “Recent results, however, demonstrated that forward swimming and crawling are two extremes in a spectrum of behaviors. Indeed the intermediate waveforms can be revealed by placing worms in appropriate intermediate media (Berri et al., 2009; Fang-Yen et al., 2010; Sznitman et al., 2010; Boyle et al., 2011).”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Berri et al., 2009

  • A waveform modulation similar to that reported for viscoelastic media has also been reported for increasing viscosities.

    “A waveform modulation similar to that reported by Berri et al. (2009) for viscoelastic media was consequently reported also for increasing viscosities (Fang-Yen et al., 2010; Shen and Arratia, 2011).”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Berri et al., 2009

  • The worm can generate crawling-like undulations even in isotropic environments with K approximately equal to 1.

    “Such a conclusion would be consistent with our previous observation (Berri et al., 2009) that the worm can generate crawling-like undulations even in isotropic environments with K ≈ 1.”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Berri et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alexander, RM (2002). "Locomotion." In The Biology of Nematodes, Lee DL, ed., pp. 345-352, Taylor and Francis.
  2. Boyle, JH, Bryden, JA, and Cohen, N (2008). "An integrated neuro- mechanical model of C. elegans forward locomotion." In LNCS: Neural Information Processing, Part 1, Vol. 4984, Ishikawa, M, Doya, K, Miyamoto, H, and Yamakawa, T, eds., pp. 37-47, Springer, Berlin.
  3. Chen, B, Hall, D, and Chklovskii, D (2006). "Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. · DOI · Paper page
  4. U.S.A. 103, 4723-4728. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chronis, N, Zimmer, M, and Bargmann, CI (2007). "Microfluidics for in vivo imaging of neuronal and behavioural activity in Caenorhabditis elegans." Nat. Methods 4(9), 727-731.
  6. See EPAPS Document No. E-HJFOA5-3-005904 for supplemental information. This document can be reached through a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html).
  7. Esmaeili, B, Ross, JM, Neades, C, Miller, DM, and Ahringer, J (2002). "The C. elegans even-skipped homologue, vab-7, specifies DB motoneurone identity and axon trajectory." Development 129(4), 853-862.
  8. Niebur, E, and Erdös, P (1993). "Theory of the locomotion of nematodes: control of the somatic motor neurons by interneurons." Math. Biosci. 118(1), 51-82.
  9. Petersen, C, et al. (2004). "In vivo identification of genes that modify ether- a-go-go-related gene activity in Caenorhabditis elegans may also affect human cardiac arrhythmia." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 11773-11778. · DOI
  10. Pierce-Shimomura, J, Chen, BL, Mun, JJ, Ho, R, Sarkis, R, and McIntire, SL (2008). "Genetic analysis of crawling and swimming locomotory patterns in C. elegans." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 20982-20987. · DOI
  11. Rubinstein, M, and Colby, RH (2003). Polymer Physics, Oxford University Press, New York.
  12. Suzuki, M, Tsuji, T, and Ohtake, H (2005). "A model of motor control of the nematode C. elegans with neuronal circuits." Artif. Intell. Med. 35(1-2), 75-86.
  13. Tsechpenakis, G, Bianchi, L, Metaxas, D, and Driscoll, M (2008). "A novel computational approach for simultaneous tracking and feature extraction of C. elegans populations in fluid environments." IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55, 1539-1549.
  14. Wittenburg, N, and Baumeister, R (1999). "Thermal avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans: an approach to the study of nociception." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10477-10482.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berri, S., Boyle, J. H., Tassieri, M., Hope, I. A., & Cohen, N.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
HFSP Journal
Published
2009-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
186-193
ISSN
  • 1955-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1955-2068
OpenAlex
W2036085310
Cited by
132
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HFSP journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/C011961/1, EP/C513711/1, EP/C011953/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, undulatory locomotion, locomotion gaits, swimming, crawling, neural control of locomotion, biomechanics, internal forces, environmental forces, locomotor activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review