Cited by 5Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Effects of Neurofeedback Training on Anxiety Symptoms Among University Students

Open access
Mutang, Jasmine Adela, Seok, Chua Bee, Ee, Guan Teik·2021·Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

Abstract

Previous studies reported that university students are a population at risk of that mental health problems. The most common intervention for anxiety disorders are pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological strategies such as psychotherapies. Besides that, there is a growing interest neurofeedback training for various mental health conditions including depression, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), stress and anxiety. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of neurofeedback training in reducing symptoms of anxiety. A quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design was employed in this study. Thirty eight students (M= 22.47 years, SD= .69 years) with moderate and severe anxiety symptoms based on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were randomly assigned to either neurofeedback training or waiting list. The neurofeedback group undergone a total of 20 neurofeedback training (3 sessions per week). The post test results indicated that neurofeedback training significantly reduce symptoms of anxiety in the neurofeedback group than those of in the waiting list group in both BAI and the GAD-7 instruments with effect size ranged from .49 to .62. Wilcoxon signed–rank test was conducted to assess the statistical differences between the pre-scores and post-scores of BAI and GAD-7 measurements within the NFT group. Significant differences within the NFT group was found between the pre-test and post-test scores in the BAI and GAD-7 measurements. In general, the current study suggest that neurofeedback was an effective treatment for anxiety symptoms among university students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/assehr.k.210423.012

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutang, J. A., Seok, C. B., & Ee, G. T.
Corresponding author
Mutang, Jasmine Adela
Venue
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Published
2021
Volume
530
ISSN
2352-5398 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158651089
Cited by
5
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UMS Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sabah) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
neurofeedback, anxiety symptoms, university students, generalized anxiety disorder, Beck Anxiety Inventory, GAD-7, non-pharmacological treatment, student mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review