Cited by 10Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTraffic control and managementTransportation Planning and Optimization

A Distributed Urban Traffic Congestion Prevention Mechanism for Mixed Flow of Human-Driven and Autonomous Electric Vehicles

Open access
Huang, Chenn-Jung, Hu, Kai-Wen, Ho, Hsing Yi, Xie, Bing Zhen, Feng, Chien-Chih, Chuang, Hung-Wen·2021·International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Abstract

Traffic congestion in urban areas has become a critical problem that municipal governments cannot overlook.Meanwhile, mixed traffic systems containing both autonomous and human-driven electric vehicles ramp up the challenge for traffic management in urban areas.Although numerous researchers have proposed traffic control heuristics to alleviate traffic congestion problems in the recent literature, scant research has addressed the joint problems of route and charging strategies for electric vehicles along with urban traffic congestion prevention.Accordingly, this work tackles the complex task of traffic management in urban areas during peak periods by using practical congestion prevention strategies that consider the characteristics of mixed traffic flows and the charging demands of electric vehicle users.Notably, we apply support vector regressions to compute the charging time at each charging point and the traverse time of an electric vehicle at each road segment/intersection, based on historical traffic data.The simulation results reveal that the proposed algorithms are feasible because they can avoid possible occurrences of traffic congestion during rush hours and provide the routes and charging options that are chosen by electric vehicle users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2991/ijcis.d.210608.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to studies, AVs in public transportation have improved traffic flow and reduced congestion.

    “From a social and economic perspective, according to studies [29][30][31], AVs in public transportation have improved traffic flow and reduced congestion.”

    From Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    Section 4.2 reports shorter travel times and lower traffic volumes with autonomous mobility-on-demand ridesharing, with further improvements when congestion control is added. But Section 4 identifies these as simulation results, not observed improvements in public transportation generally; Section 4.2 also says serious rush-hour congestion persisted with ridesharing alone. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Associated environmental benefits include improved air quality with an average reduction of nitrogen dioxide concentrations up to 4%.

    “Associated environmental benefits include improved air quality with average reduction of nitrogen dioxide concentrations up to -4% [30,40,41].”

    From Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction discusses reducing carbon emissions, but does not report nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Section 4.2 reports changes in EV traffic volumes and travel times, not air quality. Searches for nitrogen dioxide, NO₂, air pollution, and the claimed 4% reduction found no passage addressing that result. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. S. Çolak, A. Lima, M.C. González, Understanding congested travel in urban areas, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016), 1-8. · DOI
  2. C. Menelaou, S. Timotheou, P. Kolios, C.G. Panayiotou, M.M. Polycarpou, Minimizing traffic congestion through continuous- time route reservations with travel time predictions, IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 4 (2019), 141-153. · DOI
  3. A. Ahmadian, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, A. Elkamel, A review on plug-in electric vehicles: introduction, current status, and load modeling techniques, J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy. 8 (2020), 412-425. · DOI
  4. F. Ahmad, M.S. Alam, I.S. Alsaidan, S.M. Shariff, Battery swap- ping station for electric vehicles: opportunities and challenges, IET Smart Grid. 3 (2020), 280-286. · DOI
  5. V. Cirimele, M. Diana, F. Bellotti, R. Berta, N. El Sayed, A. Kobeissi, et al., The fabric ICT platform for managing wire- less dynamic charging road lanes, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 69 (2020), 2501-2512. · DOI
  6. A. Artuñedo, R.M. Del Toro, R.E. Haber, Consensus-based coop- erative control based on pollution sensing and traffic information for urban traffic networks, Sensors. 17 (2017), 953. · DOI
  7. J. Godoy, J. Pérez, E. Onieva, J. Villagrá, V. Milanés, R. Haber, A driverless vehicle demonstration on motorways and in urban environments, Transport. 30 (2015), 253-263. · DOI
  8. F. Castaño, G. Beruvides, A. Villalonga, R.E. Haber, Self-tuning method for increased obstacle detection reliability based on internet of things LiDAR sensor models, Sensors. 18 (2018), 1508. · DOI
  9. T. Chu, J. Wang, L. Codecà, Z. Li, Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for large-scale traffic signal control, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21 (2020), 1086-1095. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Z. Yao, L. Shen, R. Liu, Y. Jiang, X. Yang, A dynamic predictive traffic signal control framework in a cross-sectional vehicle infras- tructure integration environment, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21 (2020), 1455-1466. · DOI
  11. Z. Li, H. Yu, G. Zhang, S. Dong, C.Z. Xu, Network-wide traffic signal control optimization using a multi-agent deep reinforce- ment learning, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 125 (2021), 103059. · DOI
  12. A. Boukerche, D. Zhong, P. Sun, A novel reinforcement learning- based cooperative traffic signal system through max-pressure control, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. (2021). · DOI
  13. J. Mou, Intersection traffic control based on multi-objective opti- mization, IEEE Access. 8 (2020), 61615-61620. · DOI
  14. H. Liu, C. Claudel, R. Machemehl, K.A. Perrine, A robust traffic control model considering uncertainties in turning ratios, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2021). · DOI
  15. X. Li, P. Ye, J. Jin, F. Zhu, F.Y. Wang, Data augmented deep behav- ioral cloning for urban traffic control operations under a parallel learning framework, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. (2021). · DOI
  16. C. You, J. Lu, D. Filev, P. Tsiotras, Autonomous planning and con- trol for intelligent vehicles in traffic, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21 (2020), 2339-2349. · DOI
  17. Y. Du, W. ShangGuan, L. Chai, A coupled vehicle-signal control method at signalized intersections in mixed traffic environment, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 70 (2021), 2089-2100. · DOI
  18. S. Feng, Z. Song, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Robust platoon control in mixed traffic flow based on tube model predictive control, IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. (2021). · DOI
  19. S. Bahrami, M.J. Roorda, Optimal traffic management policies for mixed human and automated traffic flows, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 135 (2020), 130-143. · DOI · Paper page
  20. F. Zheng, C. Liu, X. Liu, S.E. Jabari, L. Lu, Analyzing the impact of automated vehicles on uncertainty and stability of the mixed traffic flow, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 112 (2020), 203-219. · DOI
  21. T. Li, F. Guo, R. Krishnan, A. Sivakumar, J. Polak, Right-of-way reallocation for mixed flow of autonomous vehicles and human driven vehicles, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 115 (2020), 102630. · DOI
  22. M.A.S. Kamal, T. Hayakawa, J.I. Imura, Development and evalu- ation of an adaptive traffic signal control scheme under a mixed- automated traffic scenario, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21 (2020), 590-602. · DOI
  23. H. Qi, R. Dai, Q. Tang, X. Hu, Coordinated intersection signal design for mixed traffic flow of human-driven and connected and autonomous vehicles, IEEE Access. 8 (2020), 26067-26084. · DOI
  24. Z. Yang, Y. Feng, H.X. Liu, A cooperative driving framework for urban arterials in mixed traffic conditions, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 124 (2021), 102918. · DOI
  25. A. Sharma, Z. Zheng, J. Kim, A. Bhaskar, M.M. Haque, Assess- ing traffic disturbance, efficiency, and safety of the mixed traffic flow of connected vehicles and traditional vehicles by considering human factors, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 124 (2021), 102934. · DOI
  26. L. Guo, Y. Jia, Anticipative and predictive control of automated vehicles in communication-constrained connected mixed traffic, IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. (2021). · DOI
  27. N. Wu, D. Li, Y. Xi, Distributed integrated control of a mixed traf- fic network with urban and freeway networks, IEEE Trans. Con- trol Syst. Technol. (2021). · DOI
  28. D. Ngoduy, N.H. Hoang, H.L. Vu, D. Watling, Multiclass dynamic system optimum solution for mixed traffic of human-driven and automated vehicles considering physical queues, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 145 (2021), 56-79. · DOI
  29. J. Wang, L. Lu, S. Peeta, Z. He, Optimal toll design problems under mixed traffic flow of human-driven vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 125 (2021), 102952. · DOI
  30. J. Zhang, Y. Pei, J. Shen, L. Wang, T. Ding, S. Wang, Charging strategy unifying spatial-temporal coordination of electric vehi- cles, IEEE Access. 8 (2020), 74853-74863. · DOI
  31. M. Ammous, S. Belakaria, S. Sorour, A. Abdel-Rahim, Joint delay and cost optimization of in-route charging for on-demand electric vehicles, IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 5 (2020), 149-164. · DOI
  32. A. Moradipari, M. Alizadeh, Pricing and routing mechanisms for differentiated services in an electric vehicle public charging sta- tion network, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 11 (2020), 1489-1499. · DOI
  33. H. Mao, J. Shi, Y. Zhou, G. Zhang, The electric vehicle rout- ing problem with time windows and multiple recharging options, IEEE Access. 8 (2020), 114864-114875. · DOI
  34. T. Qian, C. Shao, X. Wang, M. Shahidehpour, Deep reinforcement learning for EV charging navigation by coordinating smart grid and intelligent transportation system, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 11 (2020), 1714-1723. · DOI
  35. R. Chen, X. Qian, L. Miao, S.V. Ukkusuri, Optimal charging facil- ity location and capacity for electric vehicles considering route choice and charging time equilibrium, Comput. Oper. Res. 113 (2020), 104776. · DOI
  36. R. Basso, B. Kulcsár, I. Sanchez-Diaz, Electric vehicle routing problem with machine learning for energy prediction, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 145 (2021), 24-55. · DOI
  37. N. Chakraborty, A. Mondal, S. Mondal, Intelligent charge scheduling and eco-routing mechanism for electric vehicles: a multi-objective heuristic approach, Sustain. Cities Soc. 69 (2021), 102820. · DOI
  38. U. Bac, M. Erdem, Optimization of electric vehicle recharge schedule and routing problem with time windows and partial recharge: a comparative study for an urban logistics fleet, Sustain. Cities Soc. 70 (2021), 102883. · DOI
  39. E.Y. Kim, MRF model based real-time traffic flow prediction with support vector regression, Electron. Lett. 53 (2017), 243-245. · DOI
  40. E.Q. Martins, M.M. Pascoal, A new implementation of Yen's rank- ing loopless paths algorithm, Q. J. Belgian French Italian Oper. Res. Soc. 1 (2003), 121-133. · DOI
  41. G.P. Rocha Filho, R.I. Meneguette, J.R.T. Neto, A. Valejo, L. Weigang, J. Ueyama, G. Pessin, L.A. Villas, Enhancing intelligence in traffic management systems to aid in vehicle traffic congestion problems in smart cities, Ad Hoc Netw. 107 (2020), 102265. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C.-J., Hu, K.-W., Ho, H. Y., Xie, B. Z., Feng, C.-C., & Chuang, H.-W.
Affiliations
National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Chenn-Jung
Venue
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Published
2021
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1714
ISSN
1875-6883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3166537533
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST109-2221-E259-008, MOST 109, MOST108-2221-E259-006, MOST 108-, MOST 109-2221)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
urban traffic congestion, congestion prevention, mixed traffic, autonomous electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging strategies, route planning, support vector regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review