Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WALLS, GATES AND TOWERS. FORTIFIED SETTLEMENTS IN THE SOUTH AND CENTRE OF PORTUGAL: SOME NOTES ABOUT VIOLENCE AND WALLS IN THE 3rd MILLENIUM BCE

Gonçalves, Victor S., Sousa, Ana Catarina, Costeira, Catarina·2013·Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada

Abstract

In relation to the question of violence in the third millennium BCE, a synthesis is presented of fortified sites situated in the Centre and South of Portugal. The analysis is divided into three large territorial units: 1. Upper Eastern Algarve, with special emphasis on the Cerro do Castelo de Santa Justa; 2. Alentejo, in particular the middle Alentejo, where some recently excavated settlements and farms are to be found (São Pedro and Porto das Carretas); 3. Estremadura, the region where there is the largest concentration of fortified settlements (currently numbering 18), with over a century of archaeological research. Four main aspects were considered in testing for the possible existence of signs of violence: 1. Models of implantation; 2. Chronologies and discontinuities in the occupation of the sites; 3. Defensive architectures, especially the general ground plans, towers and gates, and internal and external reinforcements. 4. Reconstructions and remodellings.By comparing these indicators with other archaeological data, the fortifications are considered as a reaction to the violence that existed between communities, testifying to effective territorial appropriation and denoting migratory movements of the first copper archaeometallurgists originating from Andalusia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30827/cpag.v23i0.3103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the 4th millennium, funerary contexts tend to be more visible in the archaeological record than domestic ones, a pattern that shifts during the Chalcolithic with the appearance of walled enclosures.

    “During the 4th millennium, funerary contexts tend to be more visible in the archaeological record than domestic ones (Gonçalves, 2000)-a pattern that shifts during the Chalcolithic with the appearance of walled enclosures (Gonçalves et al., 2013).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gonçalves, V. S., Sousa, A. C., & Costeira, C.
Venue
Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada
Published
2013-05-22
Volume
23
Pages
35-97
ISSN
  • 2659-9295
  • 2174-8063
Cited by
5
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review