The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural Differences in the Use of Strategies for Self-Regulated Learning
Abstract
This article reports the results of a study that compared the strategies used by three different groups of upper secondary school students to regulate their own learning processes: Australian students, Japanese students at school in Japan, and Japanese students studying in Australian schools. Although students in the three groups used a similar range of strategies, the pattern of use for each cultural group varied. Variations in the pattern of strategy use were also associated with academic achievement. The structuring of the physical environment for study purposes and the checking of one’s work were two of the most important strategies for each of the groups. The Japanese students used memory strategies significantly more than did the Australian students. Furthermore, although Japanese students studying in Australia resembled their Australian counterparts more than their Japanese counterparts on many of the strategies, they still attached significantly greater importance to the use of memorization than did the Australian students. This finding is discussed in the light of cultural and educational differences between the two groups in terms of their beliefs regarding the relationship between memorization and understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675 · cited 1×
“Strategy classification was based on research into the behavior of students described as self-regulating in relation to academic learning (e.g., Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Corno & Mandinach, 1983; McCombs, 1984; Spates & Kanfer, 1977; Wang, 1983).”
MethodThe role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461528309529266 · Cited by 853
Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Marsella, A. J. (1976) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/002202217674001 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning.
Wolters, C. A. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3804_1 · Cited by 975
(2013) · Cited by 834
Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(00)00051-3 · Cited by 326
Contributions of study skills to academic competence.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2002.12086160 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Purdie, N., & Hattie, J.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 845-871
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2006826121
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.