The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation
Abstract
The article analyzes the concept of student cognitive engagement, and the manner in which classroom instruction may develop self‐regulated learners. Since theory and research on academic motivation, to date only vaguely define the role of learning processes, and since studies of learning strategies rarely assess motivational outcomes, our analysis integrates these two streams of literature. We also identify specific features of instruction and discuss how they might influence the complex of student interpretive processes focal to classroom learning and motivation. Measurement issues and research strategies peculiar to the investigation of cognitive engagement are addressed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual levels of cognitive engagement may be influenced by the instructor's encouragement and discussion facilitation as well as by intrinsic motivation.
“Of course, individual levels of cognitive engagement may be influenced by the instructor's encouragement and discussion facilitation as well as by intrinsic motivation (Corno & Mandinach, 1983).”
From Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions (2006) · cites this paper as Corno & Mandinach, 1983
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925 · see citing works
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · see citing works
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424 · see citing works
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173354 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332 · see citing works
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468 · see citing works
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292 · see citing works
A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807 · see citing works
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594 · see citing works
The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911 · see citing works
Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34085991 · Cited by 1,810 · see citing works
The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students
Crooks, T. J. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058004438 · Cited by 1,369 · see citing works
Evolutionary Personality Psychology
Buss, D. M. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Focusing the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-regulated Learning
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Effects of time-management practices on college grades.
Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory
Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning
Winne, P. H. (1996) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(96)90022-9 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions
Zhu, E. (2006) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
“Cognitive engagement in a face-to-face learning environment is observable when learners are giving sustained attention to a task requiring mental effort ( Corno & Mandinach, 1983 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialInteractivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model
Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2006) · The Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society · doi:10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom
Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/bf03217103 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Kinzie, M. B. (1990) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02298244 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
New Potentials for Data‐Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization
Koedinger, K. R., Brunskill, E., Baker, R. S. J. D., McLaughlin, E. A., & Stamper, J. (2013) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2484 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The adaptable learning process: initiating and maintaining behavioural change.
Boekaerts, M. (1992) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00713.x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Hrastinski, S. (2010) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_6 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
AL-Qadri, A. H., Mouas, S., Saraa, N., & Boudouaia, A. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00253-5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Teng, D., Zhou, X., Al‐Samarraie, H., & Fang, L. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70176 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Student Engagement in Academic Libraries: A Conceptual Framework
Zhu, X., Whitaker, E., Cho, M., & Zhang, M. (2025) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.86.2.275 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“For example, Corno and Mandinach (1983) examined students’ cognitive engagement in classrooms, and Kahn (1990) studied the physical, cognitive, and emotional aspects of employee engagement.”
- Authors
- Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Mandinach, Ellen B.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-108
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2076532645
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
- Keywords
- cognitive engagement, academic motivation, student self-regulation, learning strategies, classroom teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review