The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools
Open accessAbstract
This article presents the results of a research project on the phenomenon of out-of-field teaching in American high schools–teachers teaching subjects for which they have little education or training. Over the past couple of years, the problem of out-of-field teaching has become a prominent topic in the realm of educational policy and reform, and the results of this research have been widely reported and commented on both by education policymakers and the national media. But unfortunately, out-of-field teaching is a problem that remains largely misunderstood. My research utilizes nationally representative data from the Schools and Staffing Survey, conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. The purpose of this article is to summarize what my research has revealed about out-of-field teaching: how much of it goes on; to what extent it varies across different subjects, across different kinds of schools, and across different kinds of classrooms; and finally, the reasons for its prevalence in American schools. The data show that even using a minimal standard for qualified teachers — those holding a college minor in the fields in which they teach —the numbers of out-of-field teachers are striking. For example, a third of all secondary school teachers of mathematics have neither a major nor a minor in mathematics. My analyses have also shown that out-of-field teaching greatly varies across schools, teachers, and classrooms. The crucial question, however, and the source of great misunderstanding is why so many teachers are teaching subjects for which they have little background. 1 examine three widely believed explanations of out-of-field teaching — that out-of-field teaching is a result of either inadequate training on the part of teachers, inflexible teacher unions, or shortages of qualified teachers. My analysis shows that each of these views is seriously flawed. The article closes by offering an alternative explanation for out-of-field teaching—one focused on the organizational structure of schools and the occupational conditions and characteristics of teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Cited by
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989
“…this larger project focus upon overall levels of teacher supply, teacher turnover and teacher qualifications (Ingersoll, 1995a); levels and causes of underqualified teachers (Ingersoll, 1999); turnover among math/science teachers (Ingersoll, 2000); and overall teacher turnover (Ingersoll, 2001a).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe environment of childhood poverty
Evans, G. W. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.77 · Cited by 2,396
Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers
OECD (2005) · Education and Training Policy · doi:10.1787/9789264018044-en · Cited by 910
The Teacher Shortage: A Case of Wrong Diagnosis and Wrong Prescription
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002) · NASSP Bulletin · doi:10.1177/019263650208663103 · Cited by 585
Self-citationIs There Really a Teacher Shortage?: (382722004-001)
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e382722004-001 · Cited by 419
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingersoll, R. M.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 26
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099154992
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 120.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1177187
- The paper
- Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.