The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now?
Abstract
Since Windschitl first outlined a research agenda for the World Wide Web and classroom research, significant shifts have occurred in the nature of the Web and the conceptualization of classrooms. Such shifts have affected constructs of learning and instruction, and paths for future research. This article discusses the characteristics of Web 2.0 that differentiate it from the Web of the 1990s, describes the contextual conditions in which students use the Web today, and examines how Web 2.0’s unique capabilities and youth’s proclivities in using it influence learning and teaching. Two important themes, learner participation and creativity and online identity formation, emerged from this analysis and support a new wave of research questions. A stronger research focus on students’ everyday use of Web 2.0 technologies and their learning with Web 2.0 both in and outside of classrooms is needed. Finally, insights on how educational scholarship might be transformed with Web 2.0 in light of these themes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“Like the notions of situated learning and cognitive apprenticeship (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989), which posit learning as located in contexts and relationships rather than merely in the minds of individuals, sociocultural and sociohistorical theories are based on the assumption that learning…”
BackgroundEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991
Livingstone, S. (2008) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444808089415 · Cited by 1,780
Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439880902923580 · Cited by 456
Self-citationKuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003285 · Cited by 273
Greenhow, C., & Belbas, B. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9023-3 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Cited by
Three generations of distance education pedagogy
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890 · Cited by 1,187
Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439880902923580 · Cited by 456
Self-citationGender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education
Huang, W.-H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.001 · Cited by 287
Development of a problem-based learning model via a virtual learning environment
Phungsuk, R., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2017) · Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.01.001 · Cited by 246
(2013) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 246-259
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2122285664
- Cited by
- 1,161
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 214.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
