Cited by 19Educational Research and MethodsSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and Improvement

Post- Fisher: The Unfinished Research Agenda on Student Diversity in Higher Education

Chang, Mitchell James·2013·Educational Researcher

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x13486764

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, M. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Mitchell James
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
2013-04
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
172-173
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2034335286
Cited by
19
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
p-values, statistical significance testing, hypothesis testing, statistical inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review