The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness
Abstract
The past several years have seen a striking increase in attempts to evaluate college teaching. Included in this demand for evaluation has been the widespread use of formal student appraisal of courses and instructors. Several years ago, an extensive survey by Gustad (1961) into the methods of teacher evaluation used by 584 colleges and universities revealed that student ratings were cited most often. More recently, however, Gustad (1967) reported a substantial in the systematic use of student ratings, although he also found that informal student opinions of teaching as well as evaluations by deans and chairmen of departments were frequently used. He suggested that the decline in the use of student ratings was due to the lack of convincing validity data. However, perceived threat to faculty may also be an important cause, since in recent years a strong impetus to use student ratings has come from the students themselves (Werdell, 1967).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The critical incident technique.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0061470 · Cited by 8,191
Cited by
Marsh, H. W. (1987) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 · Cited by 1,333
Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510903008220 · Cited by 1,093
Marsh, H. W. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.76.5.707 · Cited by 1,016
Marsh, H. W. (2007) · The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., & Menges, R. J.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1971-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 511-535
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2154711772
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 175.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/00346543041005511
- The paper
- Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., & Menges, R. J. (1971). Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543041005511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.