The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings
Abstract
This review used Glass’ (1976) meta-analytic techniques to integrate findings from 59 independent evaluations of computer-based college teaching. The meta-analysis showed that computer-based instruction made small but significant contributions to the course achievement of college students and also produced positive, but again small, effects on the attitudes of students toward instruction and toward the subject matter they were studying. Computer-assisted instruction also reduced substantially the amount of time needed for instruction. In general, the meta-analysis found little relationship between study findings and design features of the experiments, settings for the studies, or manner and date of publication of the findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Cited by
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning: Linking Serious Games and Gamification of Learning
Landers, R. N. (2014) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878114563660 · Cited by 918
Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543071003449 · Cited by 721
A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-544
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2165988616
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
