Cited by 68School Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and ImprovementTeacher Education and Assessments

Value-Added Modeling and Educational Accountability: Are We Answering the Real Questions?

Everson, Kimberlee C.·2017·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

Value-added estimates of teacher or school quality are increasingly used for both high- and low-stakes accountability purposes, making understanding of their limitations critical. A review of the recent value-added literature suggests three concerns with the state of the research. First, the issues receiving the most research attention have not always been the concerns of greatest importance to theorists or critics. Second, there has been insufficient research on the interactions among various issues or assumption violations. Third, some of the big issues in value-added modeling have been challenging to address and may require educators to step back and answer some underlying philosophical questions about the nature of teacher and school quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0034654316637199

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains uncertain to what extent the digital affordances of AI chatbots contribute to measurable learning gains, and there is a need to analyze and distinguish these learning gains and their assessment methods.

    “Lastly, it remains uncertain to what extent the digital affordances of AI chatbot contributes to measurable learning gains, and there is a need to analyze and distinguish these learning gains and their assessment methods (21, 22).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Everson, K. C.
Affiliations
Western Kentucky University (US)
Corresponding author
Everson, Kimberlee C.
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
35-70
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2294369017
Cited by
68
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
26.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
value-added modeling, educational accountability, teacher quality, school quality, high-stakes testing, assumption violations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review