The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
(Un)Hidden Figures: A Synthesis of Research Examining the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women and Girls in STEM Education
Abstract
In this chapter, we argue that intersectionality is a theoretical and methodological framework by which education researchers can critically examine why and how students in STEM fields who are members of intersecting marginalized groups have distinctive experiences related to their social identities, other psychological processes, and educational outcomes. Taken separately, the bodies of education research focused on the experiences of Black students and female students in STEM fields often render Black women and girls “hidden figures” in that they have not sufficiently addressed their simultaneous racialized and gendered experiences in educational contexts. Additionally, we find that the current discourse on intersectionality is limited in that it does not attend to key psychological processes associated with identity and the intersectional experience in STEM education. We take a theoretical and methodological approach to examining intersectionality in STEM education and provide a new interpretation of the literature on Black women and girls in this social context. A synthesis of ( N = 60) research studies revealed that (1) identity; (2) STEM interest, confidence, and persistence; (3) achievement, ability perceptions, and attributions; and (4) socializers and support systems are key themes within the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Our analysis also highlights the ways that researchers have employed intersectionality to make the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education more visible, or “unhidden.” We discuss these findings from a psychological perspective and provide insights to guide future research and practice directions in STEM education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice.
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.4.271 · Cited by 5,569
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 8×
“…scholars from the fields of psychology, sociology, and legal studies have produced seminal syntheses of the knowledge and frameworks that consider how to conceptualize and analyze the implications and meanings of multiple social statuses (e.g., Cho et al., 2013; Cole, 2009; Collins, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialToward a Critical Race Theory of Education
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146819509700104 · Cited by 3,881
The Psychology of Life Stories
McAdams, D. P. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100 · Cited by 2,808 · cited 1×
“…literature on intersectionality in that it has not consistently conceptualized identity (i.e., the internalized and evolving narrative of self; see McAdams, 2001) and has not addressed the multidimensional psychological nature of social identity (e.g., salience, centrality, regard, and ideology;…”
BackgroundIntersectionality and research in psychology
Cole, E. R. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014564 · Cited by 2,722
Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013: (558442013-001)
(2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e558442013-001 · Cited by 2,471
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Cited by
Interrogating Structural Racism in STEM Higher Education
McGee, E. O. (2020) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x20972718 · Cited by 478
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM
Cech, E. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1558 · Cited by 159
Pfeifer, M. A., Reiter, E. M., Cordero, J. J., & Stanton, J. D. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-06-0107 · Cited by 85
Husbands, D., Linceviciute, S., & Yetkili, O. (2025) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2024.2386949 · Cited by 11
“Ireland et al. (2018, 229) go further, arguing that paying attention to ‘ the psychology of intersectionality in education [emphasis in original] adds value to theoretical and methodological approaches that help us examine Black women and girls’ experiences in STEM education’.”
Tanksley, T. (2023) · Journal of Computer Science Integration · doi:10.26716/jcsi.2023.12.27.49 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Ireland, D. T., Freeman, K. E., Winston-Proctor, C. E., DeLaine, K. D., McDonald Lowe, S., & Woodson, K. M.
- Venue
- Review of Research in Education
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 226-254
- ISSN
- 0091-732X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1038
- OpenAlex
- W2795475395
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 54.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: (Un)Hidden Figures: A Synthesis of Research Examining the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women and Girls in STEM Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0091732x18759072
- The paper
- Ireland, D. T., Freeman, K. E., Winston-Proctor, C. E., DeLaine, K. D., McDonald Lowe, S., & Woodson, K. M. (2018). (Un)Hidden Figures: A Synthesis of Research Examining the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women and Girls in STEM Education. Review of Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x18759072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.