Cited by 818School Choice and PerformanceTeacher Education and AssessmentsTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement

Open access
Boyd, Donald J., Grossman, Pamela L., Lankford, Hamilton, Loeb, Susanna, Wyckoff, James·2009·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

There are fierce debates over the best way to prepare teachers. Some argue that easing entry into teaching is necessary to attract strong candidates, whereas others argue that investing in high quality teacher preparation is the most promising approach. Most agree, however, that we lack a strong research basis for understanding how to prepare teachers. This article is one of the first to estimate the effects of features of teachers’ preparation on teachers’ value added to student test score performance. Our results indicate variation across preparation programs in the average effectiveness of the teachers they are supplying to New York City schools. In particular, preparation directly linked to practice appears to benefit teachers in their 1st year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373709353129

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale, quantitative studies have demonstrated the importance of clinical experiences that replicate the first year of teaching.

    “Large-scale, quantitative studies have demonstrated the importance of clinical experiences that replicate the first year of teaching (Boyd, Grossman, Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2009).”

    From Investigating the Third Space: A New Agenda for Teacher Education Research (2020) · cites this paper as Boyd, Grossman, Lankford, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D. (1999) Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling- Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  2. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Measuring effect sizes: The effect of measurement error. Working Paper prepared for the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling University of Wisconsin-Madison April 22-24, 2008.
  3. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113-132.
  4. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Michelli, N., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). Complex by design: Investigating pathways into teaching in New York City schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 155-166.
  5. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Review of research in teacher education. Washington D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education. Washington D. C.: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  8. Feldt, L., & Brennan, R. (1989). Reliability. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York: Macmillan.
  9. Grossman, P. L., Valencia, S. W., Evans, K., Thompson, C., Martin, S., & Place, N. (2000). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 631-662.
  10. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2009-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
416-440
ISSN
  • 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1062
OpenAlex
W2889724866
Cited by
818
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 52
FWCI
127.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • New York State Education Department
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
teacher preparation, teacher effectiveness, value added, student test scores, teacher education curriculum, program variation, novice teachers, New York City public schools, teacher attrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review