Cited by 219Multilingual Education and PolicySchool Choice and PerformanceEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees

Academic Achievement and Course Taking Among Language Minority Youth in U.S. Schools: Effects of ESL Placement

Open access
Callahan, Rebecca, Wilkinson, Lindsey, Muller, Chandra·2010·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

English as a second language (ESL) is meant to provide a meaningful education for students learning English (ELLs); however, its effects remain largely unexplored. Using longitudinal, nationally representative data from the Educational Longitudinal Study, the authors estimate the effects of ESL placement on language minority (LM) adolescents’ college preparation and academic achievement. Findings indicate that LM students who most closely fit the EL profile (recent immigrant, relatively low English proficiency) experience positive math outcomes and null effects in other academic areas; however, LM students who fit this profile less well experience negative effects. Results suggest that although ESL placement may benefit students most in need and for a limited time after arrival, considerable caution is advised in students’ placement and retention in ESL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373709359805

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • School-level systems that hold ELL students in language intensive classes too long limit students' access to an enriching and diverse curriculum such as school music classes and rigorous academic classes.

    “school-level systems that hold ELL students in language intensive classes too long limit students' access to an enriching and diverse curriculum such as school music classes and rigorous academic classes”

    From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Callahan et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abedi J Hofstetter CH Lord C 2004 Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research Review of Educational Research 74 1 1 28
  2. Callahan RM 2005 Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn American Educational Research Journal 42 2 305 328
  3. Callahan RM Gándara PC 2004 On nobody’s agenda: Improving English language learners’ access to higher education Sadowski M Teaching immigrant and second-language students: Strategies for success 107 127 Cambridge, MA Harvard Education Press
  4. Chamot AU O’Malley JM 1996 The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms The Elementary School Journal 96 3 259 273
  5. Dehejia RH Wahba S 2002 Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies Review of Economics and Statistics 84 1 151 61
  6. Dillon PW 2001 Labeling and English language learners: Hearing recent immigrants’ needs Hudak GM Kihn P Labeling: Pedagogy and politics 93 105 London, England Routledge Falmer
  7. Genesee F Lindholm-Leary K Saunders W Christian D 2007 Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence New York Cambridge University Press
  8. Goodlad J 1984 A place called school New York McGraw Hill
  9. Harklau L 1994a ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments TESOL Quarterly 28 2 241 272
  10. Ingels SJ Curtin TR Kaufman P Alt MN Chen X 2002 Coming of age in the 1990s: The eighth-grade class of 1988 12 years later Education Statistics Quarterly 4 2
  11. Lucas T Henze R Donato R 1990 Promoting the success of Latino language minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools Harvard Educational Review 60 315 340
  12. Lyster R 2007 Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach Philadelphia, PA John Benjamins Press
  13. Lucas T Henze R Donato R 1990 Promoting the success of Latino language minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools Harvard Educational Review 60 315 340
  14. MacSwan J Rolstad K 2003 Linguistic diversity, schooling, and social class: Rethinking our conception of language proficiency in language minority education Paulston CB Tucke GR Sociolinguistics: The essential readings 329 340 Oxford Blackwell
  15. Mahoney KS MacSwan J 2005 Reexamining identification and reclassification of English language learners: A critical discussion of select state practices Bilingual Research Journal 29 1 31 42
  16. Riehl C Pallas AM Natriello G 1999 Rites and wrongs: Institutional explanations for the student course-scheduling process in urban high schools American Journal of Education 107 116 154
  17. Roessingh H 2004 Effective high school ESL programs: A synthesis and meta-analysis The Canadian Modern Language Review 60 5 611 636
  18. Romo HD Falbo T 1996 Latino high school graduation: Defying the odds Austin University of Texas Press
  19. Schiller KS Muller C 2000 External examinations and accountability, educational expectations, and high school graduation American Journal of Education 108 2 73 102
  20. Thornton SJ 1994 The social studies near century’s end: Reconsidering patterns of curriculum and instruction Review of Research in Education 20 223 254
  21. Wang J Goldschmidt P 1999 Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement Journal of Educational Research 93 2 101 111

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callahan, R., Wilkinson, L., & Muller, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2010-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
84-117
ISSN
  • 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1062
OpenAlex
W2160585162
Cited by
219
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
34.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas at Austin (R24HD042849, 5 R24 HD042849)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Keywords
language minority students, academic performance, cumulative grade point average, English proficiency, Lau v. Nichols, English language learners, educational equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review