Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Summarizing Monte Carlo Results in Methodological Research: The One- and Two-Factor Fixed Effects ANOVA Cases

Harwell, Michael R., Rubinstein, Elaine N., Hayes, William S., Olds, Corley C.·1992·Journal of Educational Statistics
DOI 10.3102/10769986017004315
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Meta-analytic methods were used to integrate the findings of a sample of Monte Carlo studies of the robustness of the F test in the one- and two-factor fixed effects ANOVA models. Monte Carlo results for the Welch (1947) and Kruskal-Wallis (Kruskal & Wallis, 1952) tests were also analyzed. The meta-analytic results provided strong support for the robustness of the Type I error rate of the F test when certain assumptions were violated. The F test also showed excellent power properties. However, the Type I error rate of the F test was sensitive to unequal variances, even when sample sizes were equal. The error rate of the Welch test was insensitive to unequal variances when the population distribution was normal, but nonnormal distributions tended to inflate its error rate and to depress its power. Meta-analytic and exact statistical theory results were used to summarize the effects of assumption violations for the tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/10769986017004315

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. *Bishop TA, 1976, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 3822B
  2. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1980.tb00783.x · DOI
  3. 10.1080/03610918708812642 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0013164484443008 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0041412 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1214/aoms/1177728786 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.3102/10769986006001055 · DOI
  8. 10.3102/10769986007003207 · DOI
  9. 10.3102/00346543052002291 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.43 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/03610918108812235 · DOI
  12. *Donaldson TS, 1968, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 660, 10.1080/01621459.1968.11009285 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/001316447403400406 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/001316446602600205 · DOI
  15. Gayen AK, 1949, Biometrika, 36, 353
  16. 10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.236 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/03610918708812607 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.252 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1991.tb00970.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0167-9473(91)90054-6 · DOI
  21. 10.3102/10769986017004297 · DOI
  22. Hastings NAJ, 1975, Statistical distributions
  23. 10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3c.1095 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/B978-0-08-057065-5.50010-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.128 · DOI
  26. ** Iman RL, 1976, A comparison of several rank tests for the two-way layout
  27. ** Kanji GK, 1976, International Journal of Educational and Science Technology, 7, 155
  28. 10.1080/0020739760070403 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/00220973.1974.10806305 · DOI
  30. ** Lemmer HH, 1980, Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 14, 1427
  31. 10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.272 · DOI
  32. *Lin LI, Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 12, 523
  33. Marascuilo LA, 1988, Statistical methods for the social and behavior sciences
  34. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1969.tb00429.x · DOI
  35. 10.1080/03610918108812216 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/00401706.1968.10490598 · DOI
  37. * NortonDWAn empirical investigation of the effects of nonnormality and heterogeneity upon the F -test of analysis of variance1952Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City
  38. * Olejnik S, 1984, Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 141
  39. 10.1080/01621459.1973.10481394 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/biomet/21.1-4.259 · DOI
  41. * Penfield DA, 1985, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  42. Pratt JW, 1964, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 665
  43. 10.3102/10769986005004337 · DOI
  44. * Randolph E, 1990, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  45. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1986.tb00858.x · DOI
  46. 10.1177/0193841X8500900407 · DOI
  47. 10.3102/00028312014004493 · DOI
  48. SAS Institute, 1989, SAS/STAT user’s guide, 2
  49. Scheffé H, 1959, The analysis of variance
  50. Smith JH, 1980, Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 9, 1353
  51. SPSS, 1988, SPSSX user’s guide
  52. 10.1093/biomet/46.1-2.114 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/biomet/51.1-2.83 · DOI
  54. Tiku ML, 1971, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 913
  55. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.90 · DOI · Paper page
  56. ** Toothaker LE, 1980, Journal of Educational Statistics, 5, 169
  57. 10.1214/aoms/1177730495 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1080/03610918608812553 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/00220973.1987.10806451 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Harwell, M. R., Rubinstein, E. N., Hayes, W. S., & Olds, C. C.
Venue
Journal of Educational Statistics
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published
1992-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
315-339
ISSN
0362-9791 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3102/10769986017004315
OpenAlex
W2153635621
Cited by
484
References
4
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.