Cited by 110Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceProbability and Statistical Research

A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs

Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, Rand R., LIX, Lisa M.·2003·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Standard least squares analysis of variance methods suffer from poor power under arbitrarily small departures from normality and fail to control the probability of a Type I error when standard assumptions are violated. These problems are vastly reduced when using a robust measure of location; incorporating bootstrap methods can result in additional benefits. This paper illustrates the use of trimmed means with an approximate degrees of freedom heteroskedastic statistic for independent and correlated groups designs in order to achieve robustness to the biasing effects of nonnormality and variance heterogeneity. As well, we indicate when a boostrap methodology can be effectively employed to provide improved Type I error control. We also illustrate, with examples from the psychophysiological literature, the use of a new computer program to obtain numerical results for these solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-8986.00060

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, R. R., & LIX, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Keselman, H. J.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-10
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
586-596
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2171549256
Cited by
110
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
robust hypothesis testing, trimmed mean, bootstrapping, type I error control, non-normality, heteroscedasticity, analysis of variance, psychophysiological data
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Psychophysiology, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review