The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups
Abstract
Formulas for estimating sample sizes are presented to provide specified levels of power for tests of significance from a longitudinal design allowing for subject attrition. These formulas are derived for a comparison of two groups in terms of single degree-of-freedom contrasts of population means across the study timepoints. Contrasts of this type can often capture the main and interaction effects in a two-group repeated measures design. For example, a two-group comparison of either an average across time or a specific trend across time (e.g., linear or quadratic) can be considered. Since longitudinal data with attrition are often analyzed using an unbalanced repeated measures model (with a structured variance-covariance matrix for the repeated measures) or a random-effects model for incomplete longitudinal data, the variance-covariance matrix of the repeated measures is allowed to assume a variety of forms. Tables are presented listing sample size determinations assuming compound symmetry, a first-order autoregressive structure, and a non-stationary random-effects structure. Examples are provided to illustrate use of the formulas, and a computer program implementing the procedure is available from the first author.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Standard Errors and Sample Sizes for Two-Level Research
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986018003237 · Cited by 487 · cited 1×
“For random-effects models, Snijders and Bosker (1993) present approximate formulas for the standard errors of estimated regression coefficients These standard errors can be used for power calculations for explanatory variables (e.g., group effects, or group by time interactions) in random-effects…”
MethodPower Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications
Muller, K. E., Lavange, L. M., Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10476281 · Cited by 230
Approximate Power for Repeated-Measures ANOVA Lacking Sphericity
Muller, K. E., & Barton, C. N. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289941 · Cited by 177
Practical methods for computing power in testing the multivariate general linear hypothesis
Muller, K. E., & Peterson, B. L. (1984) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/0167-9473(84)90002-1 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735 · Cited by 542
Power and Sample Size in Multilevel Linear Models
Snijders, T. A. B. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa492 · Cited by 482
Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X.-F. (2001) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.6.4.387 · Cited by 455
Advances in Analysis of Longitudinal Data
Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., & DuToit, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550 · Cited by 452
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R. D., & Waternaux, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-93
- ISSN
- 1076-9986 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1054
- OpenAlex
- W1966573670
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/10769986024001070
- The paper
- Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R. D., & Waternaux, C. (1999). Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986024001070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.