Cited by 13Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

A scoping review of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with aortic dissection

Open access
Feng, Danni, Ke, Jian, Huang, Sufang, Lang, Xiaorong·2021·Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Abstract

Our objective was to provide evidence for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ECR) for patients with aortic dissection (AD), so as to better improve the prognosis of patients and improve the quality of life (QoL) after discharge. The database PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Chinese database, ZhiWang Chinese database, Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from establishment of each database until February 2021 were included. A total of 1684 records were found by searching the database and clinical trial registry, 178 duplicate records were deleted, and 11 records met the inclusion criteria according to the screening process. We can conclude that ECR for patients with AD can effectively reduce complications and shorten the course of the disease. In addition, it is very safe because there are no serious adverse events occurring. Further research should be developed from three aspects, including the development of systematic evaluation indicators and standardized clinical exercise rehabilitation pathway, more randomized controlled trials, and the development of individualized exercise program so as to help patients with AD better improve the prognosis and QoL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31083/j.rcm2203072

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, D., Ke, J., Huang, S., & Lang, X.
Affiliations
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
613-624
ISSN
  • 1530-6550 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-8174
OpenAlex
W3202946681
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71874063)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, aortic dissection, quality of life, post-discharge outcomes, rehabilitation safety, individualized exercise program
MeSH terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Aortic Dissection, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review