Cited by 62Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationCompetency Development and Evaluation

Identifying the policy implications of competency-based education

Taber, Sarah, Frank, Jason R., Harris, Kenneth A., Glasgow, Nicholas J., Iobst, William, Talbot, Martin, For The International CBME Collaborators·2010·Medical Teacher

Abstract

At their 2009 consensus conference, the International CBME Collaborators proposed a number of central tenets of CBME in order to advance the field of medical education. Although the proposed conceptualization of CBME offers several advantages and opportunities, including a greater emphasis on outcomes, a mechanism for the promotion of learner-centred curricula, and the potential to move away from time-based training and credentialing in medicine, it is also associated with several significant barriers to adoption. This paper examines the concepts of CBME through a broad educational policy lens, identifying considerations for medical education leaders, health care institutions, and policy-makers at both the meso (program, institutional) and macro (health care system, inter-jurisdictional, and international) levels. Through this analysis, it is clear that CBME is associated with a number of complex challenges and questions, and cannot be considered in isolation from the complex systems in which it functions. Much more work is needed to engage stakeholders in dialogue, to debate the issues, and to identify possible solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2010.500706

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taber, S., Frank, J. R., Harris, K. A., Glasgow, N. J., Iobst, W., Talbot, M., & Collaborators, F. T. I. C.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • American Board of Internal Medicine (US)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Taber, Sarah
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2010-07-27
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
687-691
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2149980755
Cited by
62
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
competency-based medical education, education policy, medical education reform, outcome-based education, credentialing, barriers to adoption, stakeholder engagement
MeSH terms
Competency-Based Education, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Policy Making, Organizational Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review