Cited by 697Innovations in Medical EducationMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE Guide No. 59

ten Cate, Olle Th.J., Kusurkar, Rashmi A., Williams, Geoffrey C.·2011·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Self-determination Theory (SDT), designed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, serves among the current major motivational theories in psychology. SDT research has been conducted in many areas, among which are education and health care, but its applications in medical education are rare. The potential of SDT to help understand processes in medical education justifies this Guide. SDT is explained in seven principles, one of which is the distinction of three innate psychological needs of human beings: for competence, for autonomy and for relatedness. Further, SDT elaborates how humans tend to internalise regulation of behaviour that initially has been external, in order to develop autonomous, self-determined behaviour. Implications of SDT for medical education are discussed with reference to preparation and selection, curriculum structure, classroom teaching, assessments and examinations, self-directed learning, clinical teaching, students as teachers and researchers, continuing professional development, faculty development and stress among trainees.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2011.595435

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ten Cate, O. T. J., Kusurkar, R. A., & Williams, G. C.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2011-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
961-973
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W1987523814
Cited by
697
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
self-determination theory, motivation, competence, autonomy, relatedness, autonomous regulation, medical education, curriculum structure, assessment and examination, self-directed learning, clinical teaching, continuing professional development, faculty development, student selection
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Learning, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Staff Development, Teaching, Models, Educational, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review