Cited by 640Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education Topics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63

Open access

Abstract

This Guide provides an overview of educational theory relevant to learning from experience. It considers experience gained in clinical workplaces from early medical student days through qualification to continuing professional development. Three key assumptions underpin the Guide: learning is 'situated'; it can be viewed either as an individual or a collective process; and the learning relevant to this Guide is triggered by authentic practice-based experiences. We first provide an overview of the guiding principles of experiential learning and significant historical contributions to its development as a theoretical perspective. We then discuss socio-cultural perspectives on experiential learning, highlighting their key tenets and drawing together common threads between theories. The second part of the Guide provides examples of learning from experience in practice to show how theoretical stances apply to clinical workplaces. Early experience, student clerkships and residency training are discussed in turn. We end with a summary of the current state of understanding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.650741

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Dayton D, Activity theory: A versatile framework for workplace research? Society for Technical Communication Conference [Published 2010 June 22]. Available from: www.stc.org/confproceed/2000/pdfs/00002.pdf
  2. Dewey J, 1897, School J, 54, 77
  3. Engeström Y, 2005, An introduction to Vygotsky2nd, 153
  4. Honey P, 1992, The manual of learning styles3rd
  5. Lesmes-Anel J, 2001, Br J Gen Pract, 51, 559
  6. Norman G, 2007, Med Educ, 41, 1140
  7. Schon DA, 1983, The reflective practitoner
  8. Schryer CF, 2003, Writing selves and societies: Research from activity perspectives. Fort Collins, 62
  9. Smith L, 2001, Fifty modern thinkers on education: From Piaget to the present, 37
  10. Vygotsky L, language. Translated by Kozulin A, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  11. Wertsch J, 1991, Voices of the mind
  12. 10.1080/00131728609335764 · DOI
  13. Kolb DA, 1984, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
  14. Kozulin A, Chaiklin S, Karpov Y, Egan K, Gajdamaschko N, Lidz CS, et al. (2003). In Kozulin A, Gindis B, Ageyev VS, Miller SM, editors. Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 640

Metadata

Authors
Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T.
Affiliations
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, Sarah
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2012-01-30
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e102-e115
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2114732155
Cited by
639
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
experiential learning, situated learning, clinical teaching, medical students, residency training, continuing professional development, hands-on learning
MeSH terms
Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Humans, Internship and Residency, Psychology, Educational, Students, Medical, Models, Educational, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review